Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Precompact trajectory tails have nonempty compact connected flow-invariant limit sets

Statement

Let γ:R→M be a full negative-gradient trajectory and let Φ be its flow. If γ([0,∞))‾ is compact, then

ω(γ):=⋂T≥0γ([T,∞))‾

is nonempty, compact, connected, and invariant under every Φs. The analogous conclusion holds for α(γ):=⋂T≥0γ((−∞,−T])‾ when its negative tail has compact closure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A full trajectory γ and a compact closure K of its positive tail.

[F2]

The maximal flow has open domain in R×M, is continuous, and obeys Φs(γ(t))=γ(t+s) whenever defined (The fundamental theorem on flows).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1given

Each KT:=γ([T,∞))‾ is a nonempty closed subset of K, the family is decreasing, and each KT is connected because it is the closure of the connected image of [T,∞).

1.2F1F2given

The flow domain is open and contains {0}×K by [F2]. For each q∈K there are δq>0 and a neighbourhood Vq with (−δq,δq)×Vq in that domain. A finite subcover of K gives one δ>0 such that Φs(p) is defined for every p∈K and ∣s∣<δ.

2.1F1step 1.1

If ⋂T≥0KT were empty, the open sets K∖KT would cover K; [F1] would give finitely many of them that cover. Since the KT decrease, one already covers, contradicting KT≠∅. Thus ω(γ) is nonempty; it is closed in K, hence compact, and the nested connected-set argument makes it connected.

3.1F2step 2.1step 1.2

Let p∈ω(γ) and ∣s∣<δ. Fix T≥0 and a neighbourhood W of Φs(p). Continuity gives a neighbourhood V of p with Φs(V)⊆W. Since p∈KT+∣s∣, some t≥T+∣s∣ has γ(t)∈V; then γ(t+s)=Φs(γ(t))∈W and t+s≥T. Thus Φs(p)∈KT for every T, so Φs(ω(γ))⊆ω(γ). Divide any real s into finitely many increments of size less than δ and apply this inclusion repeatedly; all intermediate points remain in ω(γ)⊆K, where the next increment is defined. The flow law then defines Φs on all of ω(γ) and maps it into itself. Applying the argument to −s gives equality.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2step 3.1∎

Replacing t by −t and using the reverse-time flow gives the asserted nonempty compact connected invariant set α(γ) for a precompact negative tail.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources