How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Orthogonal marked and unmarked components of the uniform state
Statement
Let have size with . Define Then and are orthonormal. For , the uniform state is with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , a marked set , and . Here the uniform state denotes the equal-positive-amplitude vector .
Finite marked-item search and its bit oracle: is a finite address set with marked subset and marked count .
The computational basis is orthonormal: distinct address basis vectors are orthogonal and every address basis vector has norm .
Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument: the inner product is linear in the first argument, conjugate-linear in the second, and positive definite.
Dirac Notation Conversion: kets denote vectors and the Dirac pairing is the reversed-argument root inner product.
Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine: takes values in and for .
Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine: cosine is strictly decreasing on and sine is strictly increasing on .
Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine: for every real .
Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are : each nonnegative real has a unique nonnegative square root .
Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives: on nonnegative reals, strict and non-strict order are equivalent to the corresponding order of squares; applied to nonnegative roots, this compares their order.
Proof
Orthonormality of the address basis [F2] gives and . The sets and are disjoint, so every cross term in is zero. Thus the two vectors are orthonormal.
Put and . By [F5], ; since and by [F9], strict increase [F6] implies . Also by [F11] because , while by [F10]; strict increase gives . Since cosine is strictly decreasing on by [F6], we have by [F10]. The Pythagorean identity [F7] and square-root uniqueness [F8] give . Splitting the uniform sum into and its complement now gives and .
Depends on
- Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine
- Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument
- Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine
- Finite marked-item search and its bit oracle
- Dirac Notation Conversion
- Pure state and ray
- Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives
- Square roots exist: a unique $\sqrt{a} \ge 0$ with $(\sqrt{a})^2 = a$; the positives are $\{x^2 : x \neq 0\}$
- The computational basis is orthonormal
- Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi
- The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
- Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, §7.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms, §19.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gilles Brassard, Peter Høyer, Michele Mosca, and Alain Tapp, Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)