How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Grover iterate rotates the marked/unmarked plane
Statement
Assume and use the orthonormal ordered basis of Orthogonal marked and unmarked components of the uniform state. Let project onto the marked-address span, , and . The Grover iterate preserves , and in this basis has matrix The initially prepared state has coordinate column .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and the normalized vectors in the marked/unmarked decomposition.
Orthogonal marked and unmarked components of the uniform state: are orthonormal and .
Orthogonal-Projector Reflection and Access Contract: and have the displayed opposite signs.
Proof
The mark fixes each unmarked basis vector and negates each marked basis vector. Thus its matrix on is and it preserves the plane.
In the same basis, [F1] and the rank-one convention [F3] give by [F4].
Multiplying the matrix in step 1.2 by from step 1.1 gives the stated rotation matrix. Its columns lie in the same two-dimensional plane, so the plane is invariant; the initial coordinate column is by [F1].
Depends on
- One Grover iterate in the standard bit-query model
- The adjoint $T^*:W\to V$ is characterised by $\langle Tv,w\rangle_W=\langle v,T^*w\rangle_V$
- Dirac Notation Conversion
- Orthogonal-Projector Reflection and Access Contract
- Orthogonal marked and unmarked components of the uniform state
- Double-angle and quadratic power-reduction identities
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, §7.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms, §19.1 (standard reference, not scraped)