How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ideal inverse amplitude and HHL postselection probability
Statement
For the ideal exact-eigenvalue version of HHL finite sine-window phase-estimation algorithm, on a normalized supported on , the well-flag vector is . Its probability satisfies , and its normalized state is the QLSP target.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A self-adjoint , a normalized , and the support promise.
Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely: a normal finite-dimensional complex endomorphism has an orthonormal eigenbasis; implies is normal.
The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse as the solution of the four Penrose equations and Every finite real or complex matrix has a unique Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse: the pseudoinverse is the unique matrix satisfying , , and self-adjointness of and .
Odd-well and even-ill reciprocal filter: on the supported spectrum and .
Quantum linear-systems state-output task: the target is the normalized pseudoinverse action on the supported input.
The adjoint is characterised by and Dirac Notation Conversion: , and the root inner product is linear in its first argument and conjugate-linear in its second.
Proof
In the eigenbasis from [F1], if , self-adjointness and [F5] give so every is real. Define for and for . Diagonal multiplication gives , , and equal to the orthogonal projection onto the nonzero-eigenvalue span; both products are self-adjoint. Thus satisfies [F2], and uniqueness gives .
Expand in [F1], with . Put ; then and every has , so [F3] multiplies it by . Step 1.1 therefore gives the well vector . Its normalization is the state in [F4].
Orthonormality gives . For , , so each weight factor lies in . Their convex average lies in the same interval, proving .
Depends on
- HHL finite sine-window phase-estimation algorithm
- Quantum linear-systems state-output task
- Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely
- The adjoint $T^*:W\to V$ is characterised by $\langle Tv,w\rangle_W=\langle v,T^*w\rangle_V$
- The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse $A^+$ as the solution of the four Penrose equations
- Every finite real or complex matrix has a unique Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse
- Odd-well and even-ill reciprocal filter
- Dirac Notation Conversion
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Aram W. Harrow, Avinatan Hassidim, and Seth Lloyd, Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Robin Kothari, and Rolando D. Somma, Quantum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms (standard reference, not scraped)