Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ideal inverse amplitude and HHL postselection probability

Statement

For the ideal exact-eigenvalue version of HHL finite sine-window phase-estimation algorithm, on a normalized ∣b⟩ supported on 1/κ≤∣λ∣≤1, the well-flag vector is v=(2κ)−1H+∣b⟩. Its probability p=∥v∥2 satisfies 1/(4κ2)≤p≤1/4, and its normalized state is the QLSP target.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A self-adjoint H, a normalized ∣b⟩, and the support promise.

[F1]

Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely: a normal finite-dimensional complex endomorphism has an orthonormal eigenbasis; H=H∗ implies H is normal.

[F2]

The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse A+ as the solution of the four Penrose equations and Every finite real or complex matrix has a unique Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse: the pseudoinverse is the unique matrix satisfying HH+H=H, H+HH+=H+, and self-adjointness of HH+ and H+H.

[F3]

Odd-well and even-ill reciprocal filter: on the supported spectrum fκ(λ)=1/(2κλ) and gκ(λ)=0.

[F4]

Quantum linear-systems state-output task: the target is the normalized pseudoinverse action on the supported input.

[F5]

The adjoint T∗:W→V is characterised by ⟨Tv,w⟩W=⟨v,T∗w⟩V and Dirac Notation Conversion: ⟨Hx,y⟩=⟨x,H∗y⟩, and the root inner product is linear in its first argument and conjugate-linear in its second.

Proof

1.1F1F2F5algebra

In the eigenbasis from [F1], if Huj=λjuj, self-adjointness and [F5] give λj∥uj∥2=⟨Huj,uj⟩=⟨uj,H∗uj⟩=⟨uj,Huj⟩=λj‾∥uj∥2, so every λj is real. Define Guj=λj−1uj for λj≠0 and Guj=0 for λj=0. Diagonal multiplication gives HGH=H, GHG=G, and HG=GH equal to the orthogonal projection onto the nonzero-eigenvalue span; both products are self-adjoint. Thus G satisfies [F2], and uniqueness gives H+=G.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Expand ∣b⟩=∑jβj∣uj⟩ in [F1], with ∑j∣βj∣2=1. Put J={j:βj≠0}; then ∑j∈J∣βj∣2=1 and every j∈J has 1/κ≤∣λj∣≤1, so [F3] multiplies it by (2κλj)−1. Step 1.1 therefore gives the well vector v=∑j∈Jβj(2κλj)−1∣uj⟩=(2κ)−1H+∣b⟩. Its normalization is the state in [F4].

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

Orthonormality gives p=∑j∈J∣βj∣2/(4κ2∣λj∣2). For j∈J, 1≤∣λj∣−1≤κ, so each weight factor lies in [1/(4κ2),1/4]. Their convex average lies in the same interval, proving 1/(4κ2)≤p≤1/4.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources