Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Packing bound for separated randomized message rows

Statement

If A,B are N×m row-stochastic matrices and M∈[0,1]^{m×m} satisfies (AMBᵀ)_xx≥0.99 and (AMBᵀ)_xy≤0.01 for x≠y, then for every m≥2, N≤exp(60(ln m)²).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: N≥1, m≥2, row-stochastic matrices A,B∈[0,1]N×m and M∈[0,1]m×m such that (AMBT)xx≥0.99 and (AMBT)xy≤0.01 for x≠y.

[F1]

Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices: H(p)=−∑ipiln⁡pi and a row-stochastic matrix has nonnegative entries with every row summing to one.

[F2]

Private-message conditioning lowers output entropy: Under the hypotheses and decomposition of Conditioning on a private message separates average acceptance, ∑jqjH(D(j)A)≤H(DA)−1/2.

[F3]

The logarithm tangent inequality: ln⁡t≤t−1 for every t>0.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

Let D be any probability row with ∥D∥2≤0.1. For every probability vector p, each coordinate lies in [0,1], so −piln⁡pi≥0 when pi>0, and the defined zero terms are also nonnegative; hence H(p)≥0. In particular this holds for DA and each D(j)A. The output entropy satisfies H(DA)≤ln⁡m, because D(DA∥u)=ln⁡m−H(DA)≥0 for uniform u, and nonnegativity follows by summing [F3]. Apply [F2]. Set L={j:H(D(j)A)≤H(DA)−1/4} and s=∑j∈Lqj. Since the average child entropy is nonnegative and at most H(DA)−1/2, first H(DA)≥1/2; then we have (1−s)(H(DA)−1/4)≤H(DA)−1/2, so s≥1/(4ln⁡m).

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

Nonnegative coordinates and D=∑jqjD(j) imply ∑j∈Lqj∥D(j)∥2≤m∥D∥2. Indeed Cauchy–Schwarz bounds the left side by m(∑jqj2∥D(j)∥22)1/2, and the square under the radical is at most ∥∑jqjD(j)∥22 because all pairwise coordinate inner products are nonnegative. Dividing by s shows some j∈L with positive weight has both entropy drop at least 1/4 and ∥D(j)∥2≤R∥D∥2, where R=4mln⁡m.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1algebra

Start from the uniform distribution D(0) on [N], of norm N−1/2. While the norm is at most 0.1, step 2.1 selects a child with entropy reduced by at least 1/4 and norm multiplied by at most R. Since the initial entropy is at most ln⁡m, after at most K=⌊4ln⁡m⌋+1 such reductions the entropy would be negative; therefore either N<100 initially, or some D(k) with k≤K has norm greater than 0.1. In the latter case 0.1<N−1/2RK, so N<100R2K.

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

For m≥2, K≤5.45ln⁡m, ln⁡R=ln⁡4+12ln⁡m+ln⁡ln⁡m≤3.5ln⁡m, and ln⁡100≤9.6(ln⁡m)2. Thus ln⁡(100R2K)≤47.8(ln⁡m)2<60(ln⁡m)2. The initial case N<100 also satisfies this bound. Therefore N≤exp⁡(60(ln⁡m)2).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources