How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conditioning on a private message separates average acceptance
Statement
Let A,B be N×m row-stochastic matrices, M∈[0,1]^{m×m}, and let C=AMBᵀ satisfy C_xx≥0.99 and C_xy≤0.01 for x≠y. For every probability row vector D with ||D||₂²≤0.01 there are weights q_j and probability rows D_j with D=Σ_jq_jD_j such that, for rows X_j=(M_ij)_{i=1}^m (the transposes of the columns of M), Σ_j q_j(DA)X_jᵀ≤0.02 and Σ_jq_j(D_jA)X_jᵀ≥0.99.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , row-stochastic , , and with and when . Let be a probability row vector with .
Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices: A matrix is row-stochastic when each row sums to one.
Proof
For each message index , set . If , put ; if , put . Then each is a probability vector, , and , because ; zero-weight terms contribute nothing.
Let be the transpose of column of . Reordering finite sums gives Also . Write . Since all entries of are probabilities, ; hence this last quantity is at most . These are the required decomposition and acceptance bounds.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ilan Newman and Mario Szegedy, Public vs. Private Coin Flips in One Round Communication Games (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, arXiv:1907.09415v6 (standard reference, not scraped)