Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Squared entry denominator bound

Statement

For nonzero z∈D, write s=sde⁡(z). There is m∈{0,1} such that sde⁡(∣z∣2)=2s−m. In particular, if sde⁡(∣z∣2)≤3, then sde⁡(z)≤2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: O=Z[ω], 2=ω−ω3, and the exponent is the least integer power placing an element in O.

[F1]

Square root of two divisibility criterion in the eighth cyclotomic ring: for x=a+bω+cω2+dω3, 2∣x iff a+c and b+d are even, and xxˉ=P+2Q with P≡(a+c)+(b+d) and Q≡(a+c)(b+d)(mod2).

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Put s=sde⁡(z) and x=(2)sz∈O. Minimality of s implies 2∤x, since otherwise x=2y with y∈O would make (2)s−1z=y∈O.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Write x=a+bω+cω2+dω3 and set A=a+c, B=b+d. By [F1], 2∤x means (A,B) is not (0,0) modulo 2. The two congruences P≡A+B and Q≡AB show that P,Q are not both even: among the three nonzero pairs (A,B)∈{0,1}2, the pair (A+B,AB) is never (0,0). For P+2Q, divisibility by (2)2=2 is equivalent to both coefficients P,Q being even. Hence xxˉ is divisible by 2 at most once.

3.1step 2.1algebra

Let m∈{0,1} be the number of factors 2 dividing xxˉ; write xxˉ=(2)my with y∈O and 2∤y. Since ∣z∣2=(xxˉ)/(2)2s, its least denominator exponent is 2s−m: multiplying by that power gives y, while any smaller exponent leaves a denominator because 2∤y. Thus sde⁡(∣z∣2)=2s−m.

4.1step 3.1givenalgebra∎

The hypothesis gives 2s−m≤3 and m≤1, so 2s≤4 and s≤2.

Remarks

The zero case is excluded in the statement; for z=0 both denominator exponents have the stipulated value −∞ and the implication also holds.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources