How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Denominator exponent and optimal T count for determinant-one unitaries
Statement
Let with . Let be the least nonnegative integer such that . Count T gates over up to global phase. If , each of and has optimal T count in , and
If , both counts are zero. If are nonzero and , their individual least exponents both equal .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed determinant-one matrix, exact gate matrices, and the stated cost model.
Exact single-qubit Clifford+T ring characterization supplies an exact Clifford+T word for every unitary over .
Reduced Hadamard words and their exact denominators gives an exact reduced word with H gates and odd interior powers, and squared-entry exponent for or for .
H-count and T-count optimality of exact Clifford+T synthesis establishes T optimality of every reduced word with , with count for endpoint exponents .
Squared entry denominator bound gives when .
Unit-modulus elements of the dyadic cyclotomic ring says a unit-modulus element of is a power of .
Proof
Reduce an exact word supplied by [F1] as in [F2], retaining its scalar . When , the matrix is monomial with unit-modulus nonzero entries, so [F5] gives . Since its determinant is one, its diagonal exponent is even: its determinant is . Hence the matrix uses no T gates, and neither does its conjugate by , which changes its monomial exponent by or . When , every entry has modulus , and [F4] gives exponent for every entry; thus .
For , set . All four squared moduli have exponent : they are either or , and the latter has primitive numerator whenever the former has positive least exponent, since subtracting from cannot make its primitive numerator divisible by . By [F4], every entry therefore has exponent , so . Together with step 1.1, every case with has , except that was treated separately.
Write . The exact reduced word has determinant , so is even. Its optimal T count is by [F3]. Conjugating by changes the endpoint exponents to and and leaves every odd interior exponent unchanged; hence both endpoint parities flip. The conjugate is still reduced with the same and has optimal count . If is even, the determinant parity forces , giving both counts . If is odd, it forces or , giving the two counts and . This includes . Together with the monomial case in step 1.1, all assertions follow.
Remarks
The common nonnegative exponent handles without assigning a negative or infinite matrix exponent. When are nonzero and , the proof shows it is also the individual least exponent used in the usual synthesis formula. This provides the denominator/T-count relation locally rather than invoking a normal-form figure as a proof.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ross and Selinger, Optimal ancilla-free Clifford+T approximation of z-rotations (standard reference, not scraped)