Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tableau row reduction returns the deterministic Pauli sign

Statement

Let n≥0 and let g1,…,gn be the independent signed rows of a rank-n stabilizer tableau with unit stabilizer representative ψ, and let a Hermitian Pauli M commute with every row. Binary Gaussian elimination finds the unique c∈F2n whose row-label sum is λ(M). The phase-aware product G=∏j=1ngjcj, taken in increasing row order, is exactly (−1)bM for the deterministic measurement bit b.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A valid generator tableau and a Hermitian Pauli M commuting with its stabilizer subgroup.

[F1]

Phase-aware stabilizer tableau: tableau rows store exact phase-aware Paulis and independent binary labels.

[F2]

Stabilizer labels form an isotropic space of the same rank: the row labels span an isotropic space L, the label map is injective on the stabilizer group, and the row labels form a basis of L in a rank-n tableau.

[F3]

A maximal stabilizer label space is self-dual: for this rank-n stabilizer, L⊥=L.

[F4]

Pauli commutator is symplectic pairing: commutation is equivalent to zero label pairing.

[F5]

Hermitian Pauli phase criterion: P(k,x,z) is Hermitian exactly when k≡x⋅z(mod2), and a Hermitian Pauli squares to I.

[F6]

Stabilizer state: every stabilizer row fixes the represented ray.

[F7]

Pauli product and adjoint: phase-aware row multiplication uses the exact formula P(k,x,z)P(k′,x′,z′)=P(k+k′+2(z⋅x′),x+x′,z+z′), with the binary dot product evaluated as 0 or 1 before doubling in Z/4Z.

[F8]

Pauli measurement branch semantics: outcome b has projector Pb onto the (−1)b eigenspace and probability Tr⁡(∣ψ⟩⟨ψ∣Pb).

[F9]

Pure-state projective branch probability is a squared norm: for normalized ψ, Tr⁡(∣ψ⟩⟨ψ∣Pb)=∥Pbψ∥2.

[F10]

Binary Pauli quotient isomorphism: equal binary labels mean the Pauli operators differ by a scalar phase.

[F11]

Ray-to-projector is well-defined and bijective: a unit representative of the stabilizer ray defines a density operator.

[F12]

Pauli group on the empty register: on the empty register, the Hermitian Paulis are I and −I, and the binary-label space is the zero space.

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement.

1.1F8F9F11F12givenalgebra

If n=0, the row list and its label list are empty, so the unique coefficient vector is c=() and the row product is the empty product G=I. By [F12], M=±I, so there is a unique bit b with G=(−1)bM. The stabilizer ray has a unit representative ψ and Mψ=(−1)bψ. Therefore Pbψ=ψ and P1−bψ=0. By [F11], [F8], and [F9], the branch probabilities are one and zero, so the deterministic measurement bit is b.

1.2F1F2F3F4givenalgebra

Assume now n≥1. Since M commutes with every stabilizer row, [F4] gives λ(M)∈L⊥=L by [F3]. The row labels form a basis of L by [F2], so the linear system with those rows and target λ(M) is consistent and has a unique coefficient vector c. Gaussian elimination over F2 returns it by pivoting on the independent rows.

2.1F1F2F5F7F10step 1.2

Multiplying the selected commuting rows in increasing order using [F7] produces the group element G with label ∑jcjλ(gj)=λ(M). By [F10], G and M differ by a scalar; as both are Hermitian, [F5] makes that scalar +1 or −1. The exact product phase therefore determines the unique bit b with G=(−1)bM.

3.1F6F8F9F11F12step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Since G is a product of stabilizer rows (the empty product when n=0), [F6] gives Gψ=ψ. Thus Mψ=(−1)bψ. By [F11], the unit ray projector is a density operator, and [F8] and [F9] give that the corresponding branch has probability one and the opposite branch has probability zero. Hence the phase returned by the row reduction is exactly the deterministic measurement bit.

Sources

Aaronson–Gottesman §III, PDF pp. 4–5, explains phase accumulation and the deterministic measurement sign; de Wolf §20.3, PDF p. 188, identifies the sign as the measured eigenvalue.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources