Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Toric checks decompose into joint syndrome eigenspaces

Statement

Delete the star A0,0 and plaquette B0,0 from the full check list, and call the remaining r=2L2−2 checks g1,…,gr. They are independent commuting Hermitian involutions. For each sign string s∈F2r, the operator

Ps=∏a=1rI+(−1)saga2

is the orthogonal projection onto the corresponding joint eigenspace; the Ps are pairwise orthogonal and sum to the identity. The omitted checks are determined by the retained ones, so every nonzero syndrome sector has an even number of e defects and an even number of m defects.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The periodic toric checks for L≥3 and the physical Hilbert space on 2L2 qubits.

[F1]

Toric star and plaquette checks: every check is a Hermitian involution supported on four distinct edge qubits.

[F2]

Toric checks commute and have two global relations: all checks commute, and the product of all stars and the product of all plaquettes are both I.

[F3]

Toric incidence maps have exactly one relation each: after deleting one fixed star and one fixed plaquette, the remaining star and face-boundary supports are independent within their respective X and Z coordinates.

[F4]

Toric e and m syndromes: e and m defects are exactly the negative star and plaquette checks, respectively.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

A product of retained checks with identity binary support must have zero X support and zero Z support separately. By [F3], this forces the selected star subset and plaquette subset both to be empty, so the retained checks are independent. By [F1] and [F2] they are commuting Hermitian involutions. For a retained check ga and sign sa, put pa,sa=(I+(−1)saga)/2. Direct expansion using ga∗=ga and ga2=I gives pa,sa∗=pa,sa and pa,sa2=pa,sa. The checks commute, so their factors commute; hence Ps is a self-adjoint idempotent, thus an orthogonal projection.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

If s≠t, choose an index a with sa≠ta. Then pa,sapa,ta=(I−ga2)/4=0, so PsPt=0. Summing over all sign strings and distributing the finite product gives ∑sPs=∏a(pa,0+pa,1)=I. Thus the ranges are pairwise orthogonal and their direct sum is the whole Hilbert space; zero projections are allowed.

3.1F2F4step 2.1algebra∎

By [F2], the omitted star is the product of all retained stars, so on ran⁡Ps its eigenvalue is the product of their signs; the product of the eigenvalues over all stars is therefore +1. A finite list of signs in {+1,−1} has product +1 exactly when it contains an even number of minus signs. The same argument for the omitted plaquette gives even parity for the negative plaquette checks. By [F4], these are the e and m defect parities. The projectors therefore decompose the register into the stated full-check syndrome sectors.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources