Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bounded-overhead tie normalization for fair-bit machines

Statement

For a fair-bit probabilistic machine with an explicit time-constructible integer clock R(n)≥1, a machine with no exact 1/2 acceptance probability can be formed with O(R(n)) additional time. It preserves strict-majority membership, and swapping its accept/reject labels decides the complement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a fixed fair-bit probabilistic machine, an explicit time-constructible integer clock R(n)≥1 that bounds every branch, and acceptance probability p on an input of length n.

[F1]

A length-R fair-bit string has probability 2^{-R}; unused suffix bits after halting are counted with their common halting outcome (Probabilistic polynomial time machine interface).

[F2]

PrTIME uses strict acceptance probability greater than one half, while a no-instance has probability at most one half (Unbounded error time space counting model).

[F3]

The clock is a time-constructible function, so a machine can perform the specified R(n) padding transitions (Time-constructible and space-constructible functions).

Proof

1.1F1F3givenconstructalgebra

At the fixed input let R=R(n) and let A count accepting strings among the 2R fair-bit strings, including unused suffixes after early halting; then p=A/2R by [F1]. The new machine first reads R+2 selector bits, rejecting only the all-zero selector. On every nonzero selector it simulates the original machine for at most R steps using R fresh bits, records its outcome, and consumes any unused suffix bits in a no-op state. On the zero selector it consumes all R fresh bits and rejects. By [F3] this is a well-defined clocked procedure. There are exactly 22R+2 equiprobable strings and exactly (2R+2−1)A accepting ones, so p′=(1−2−(R+2))p.

2.1step 1.1algebra

If p≤1/2 then p′<1/2. If p>1/2, then A≥2R−1+1, so p−1/2≥2−R; because p≤1, p′−1/2=(p−1/2)−p 2−(R+2)≥2−R−2−(R+2)>0. Thus strict majority is preserved and an original tie becomes a strict no-instance.

3.1step 1.1F2algebra∎

The new acceptance probability cannot equal one half: such equality would require the integer A to equal 22R+1/(2R+2−1), which is not an integer because its denominator is odd and greater than one. Since no tie remains, swapping accepting and rejecting labels makes the complement machine accept strictly above one half exactly on the original no-instances. The selector and padding add 2R+2 transitions, so the overhead is O(R(n)).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources