How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded-overhead tie normalization for fair-bit machines
Statement
For a fair-bit probabilistic machine with an explicit time-constructible integer clock , a machine with no exact acceptance probability can be formed with additional time. It preserves strict-majority membership, and swapping its accept/reject labels decides the complement.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a fixed fair-bit probabilistic machine, an explicit time-constructible integer clock that bounds every branch, and acceptance probability on an input of length .
A length-R fair-bit string has probability 2^{-R}; unused suffix bits after halting are counted with their common halting outcome (Probabilistic polynomial time machine interface).
PrTIME uses strict acceptance probability greater than one half, while a no-instance has probability at most one half (Unbounded error time space counting model).
The clock is a time-constructible function, so a machine can perform the specified padding transitions (Time-constructible and space-constructible functions).
Proof
At the fixed input let and let count accepting strings among the fair-bit strings, including unused suffixes after early halting; then by [F1]. The new machine first reads selector bits, rejecting only the all-zero selector. On every nonzero selector it simulates the original machine for at most steps using fresh bits, records its outcome, and consumes any unused suffix bits in a no-op state. On the zero selector it consumes all fresh bits and rejects. By [F3] this is a well-defined clocked procedure. There are exactly equiprobable strings and exactly accepting ones, so .
If then . If , then , so ; because , . Thus strict majority is preserved and an original tie becomes a strict no-instance.
The new acceptance probability cannot equal one half: such equality would require the integer to equal , which is not an integer because its denominator is odd and greater than one. Since no tie remains, swapping accepting and rejecting labels makes the complement machine accept strictly above one half exactly on the original no-instances. The selector and padding add transitions, so the overhead is .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Van Melkebeek and Watson, A Quantum Time-Space Lower Bound for the Counting Hierarchy, randomization conventions (standard reference, not scraped)
- Eric Allender et al., Time-Space Tradeoffs in the Counting Hierarchy (standard reference, not scraped)