Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A separating prime for an element outside a radical

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let R be a commutative ring, let I⊴R be an ideal, and let f∈R. If f∉I, then there exists a prime ideal p of R such that I⊆p and f∉p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, an ideal I⊴R, an element f∉I, and the Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

An element belongs to I exactly when one of its positive powers lies in I (The radical of an ideal).

[L2]

If every positive power of f avoids I, then some prime ideal contains I but avoids f (Separating an element from an ideal by a prime).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

Since f∉I, [L1] says that fn∉I for every integer n≥1.

2.1L2step 1.1

Applying [L2] to step 1.1 yields a prime ideal p with I⊆p and f∉p.

3.1step 2.1∎

This prime separates f from the radical of I.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources