How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A separating prime for an element outside a radical
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let . If , then there exists a prime ideal of such that and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , an ideal , an element , and the Axiom of Choice.
An element belongs to exactly when one of its positive powers lies in (The radical of an ideal).
If every positive power of avoids , then some prime ideal contains but avoids (Separating an element from an ideal by a prime).
Proof
Since , [L1] says that for every integer .
Applying [L2] to step 1.1 yields a prime ideal with and .
This prime separates from the radical of .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Hochster, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Math 614 notes (2020) (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §2 Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)