Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A separating prime for an element outside a radical

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let R be a commutative ring, let IR be an ideal, and let fR. If fI, then there exists a prime ideal p of R such that Ip and fp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, an ideal IR, an element fI, and the Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

An element belongs to I exactly when one of its positive powers lies in I (The radical of an ideal).

[L2]

If every positive power of f avoids I, then some prime ideal contains I but avoids f (Separating an element from an ideal by a prime).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since fI, [L1] says that fnI for every integer n1.

L1given
2.1

Applying [L2] to step 1.1 yields a prime ideal p with Ip and fp.

L2step 1.1
3.1

This prime separates f from the radical of I.

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources