How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Primes containing an ideal contain its radical
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be a prime ideal with . Then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , an ideal , and a prime ideal containing .
An element lies in exactly when some positive power of it lies in (The radical of an ideal).
A prime ideal is proper and contains a factor whenever it contains a product (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).
Proof
Let . Choose with . Since , one has .
Repeatedly applying primality from [L2] to the factorization shows that : if , then ; repeating the same argument eventually forces after all.
Every element of lies in , so .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §2 Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §2 Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)