How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Separating an element from an ideal by a prime
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let . If for every integer , then there exists a prime ideal of such that and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , an ideal , an element whose positive powers all avoid , and the Axiom of Choice.
If an ideal is disjoint from a multiplicative set, then some prime ideal contains it and stays disjoint from that multiplicative set (A prime containing an ideal and avoiding a multiplicative set).
Proof
The set is multiplicative, and the hypothesis says exactly that .
Applying [L1] to the ideal and the multiplicative set yields a prime ideal with and . In particular .
This is the required separating prime.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §2 Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §2 Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)