How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Southwest rank matrices determine Bruhat cells
Statement
Let , let be a prime power, put with standard Borel subgroup , and for and let denote the rank of the submatrix of on the rows and the columns (Row space, column space, nullspace, row rank, column rank and matrix rank). Then:
- for all , so is constant on each double coset ;
- if for a permutation matrix (Permutation Weyl group and inversion length), then
- for , triangular elimination supplies a permutation matrix with (Triangular elimination produces a pivot permutation), and the rank matrix determines , and hence determines the double coset , uniquely.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , a prime power , the group with subgroup of invertible upper triangular matrices, a matrix , the ranks of its southwest submatrices, and the permutation matrix of .
A matrix is upper triangular exactly when for (Upper triangular, lower triangular and diagonal square matrices over a commutative ring).
For the row space is spanned by the rows of , the column space is spanned by the columns, , , and the rank of is its row rank (Row space, column space, nullspace, row rank, column rank and matrix rank).
For every finite matrix over a field one has (Row rank equals column rank, and both equal the number of pivots).
The product of matrices is given by (Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes), so products may be computed block by block.
For the following are equivalent: is invertible, and (Invertible matrix theorem: invertibility, full pivot rank, RREF , trivial nullspace and unique solvability are equivalent).
The permutation matrix has precisely when (Permutation Weyl group and inversion length).
A basis of a finite-dimensional space is a linearly independent spanning set, and the dimension is the number of elements of any basis (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis).
Every has a factorisation with and (Triangular elimination produces a pivot permutation).
Proof
Left invariance: for and any the submatrix of on the rows and columns equals the product of the invertible upper triangular block with the submatrix . Indeed, for the entry vanishes whenever , by [L2], so only the columns of contribute, and the product formula of [L5] applies blockwise. The block is invertible: since is invertible and upper triangular, all its diagonal entries are nonzero, and the trailing block is upper triangular with those same nonzero diagonal entries, so triangular back substitution gives and [L6] applies. Left multiplication by an invertible matrix does not change the row space, since the rows of are linear combinations of the rows of while the rows of are those of ; hence and .
Right invariance: for and any the submatrix of on the rows and columns equals the product of with the invertible upper triangular block : since whenever , the sum of [L5] runs over the indices only. The block is invertible, because a nonzero kernel vector with gives by [L2] and hence by [L6]. Right multiplication by an invertible matrix does not change the column space: because is bijective. By [L4] the rank equals the column rank, so .
Permutation matrices: the submatrix of on the rows and columns has, in column , the single nonzero entry in row when , and is the zero column otherwise, by [L7]. Its nonzero columns are the distinct standard basis vectors of the coordinate space on the rows , one for each with ; they form a linearly independent spanning set of the column space, hence a basis, so by [L3] and [L8] the column rank, and therefore by [L4] the rank of this submatrix, equals the number of such columns, that is .
Let with . Writing with and applying step 1.1 to and step 1.2 to , then step 1.3 to , gives for all . In particular, subtracting consecutive columns of the rank matrix, equals exactly when , where ; hence the set of with is and for every . Thus the rank matrix of determines . By [L9] every element of admits such a factorisation, so two elements of lie in the same double coset exactly when their southwest rank matrices agree. ∎
Depends on
- Standard subgroups of finite general linear groups
- Permutation Weyl group and inversion length
- Row space, column space, nullspace, row rank, column rank and matrix rank
- Upper triangular, lower triangular and diagonal square matrices over a commutative ring
- Row rank equals column rank, and both equal the number of pivots
- Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix $I_n$, including zero-sized shapes
- Invertible matrix theorem: invertibility, full pivot rank, RREF $I$, trivial nullspace and unique solvability are equivalent
- Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
- Triangular elimination produces a pivot permutation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Olivier Dudas and Jean Michel, Lectures on Finite Reductive Groups and Their Representations - Example 4.5, printed p. 18 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jay Taylor, Finite Reductive Groups - Exercise 4.28, printed pp. 38-39 (standard reference, not scraped)