How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A rank-one surface module is principalized by an ideal blowup
Statement
Assume AC and DC. For a finite torsion-free rank-one module over a Noetherian domain , there is a nonzero ideal and a blowup such that modulo torsion is invertible; the same holds on every integral model dominating .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite torsion-free rank-one module over a Noetherian domain , with an identification .
def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function with domain satisfying for all . (The Axiom of Choice)
def-dependent-choice. Let be a set and let be a binary relation on . Call entire on when The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written , is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
def-blowup-scheme-along-ideal. Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a scheme and let be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type (def-quasi-coherent-ideal-sheaf), with zero scheme , the closed subscheme of cut out by . (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf)
thm-blowup-projective. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a scheme, let be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type on (def-quasi-coherent-ideal-sheaf) and let be the blowup of Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf. Then: 1. (Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper)
thm-pullback-center-ideal-invertible. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type on a scheme (def-quasi-coherent-ideal-sheaf), let be its blowup and let be the exceptional subscheme, with the convention that (The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier)
Proof
Torsion-freeness makes the natural map injective, so is identified with a nonzero -submodule of the fraction field; choose a finite generating family of over .
Write with and , put , and let . Then is a nonzero ideal of and multiplication by is an isomorphism of -modules with inverse division by , which is well defined because and is torsion-free.
Let be the blowup of along ; the scheme is integral because is a domain and , the morphism is projective, and the pullback ideal is invertible on .
The inclusion of step 2.1 pulls back to a map of -modules whose image is the invertible ideal ; the map is an isomorphism at the generic point, so its kernel has zero generic stalk, that is, is a torsion -module. Since , the module is isomorphic to the invertible sheaf , so modulo torsion is invertible.
On an integral affine chart with fraction field , an element of the kernel of is an element of the finite -module killed after multiplying by some element clearing its zero generic germ, so it is annihilated by a nonzero element of ; conversely an element annihilated by a nonzero scalar maps to zero in the torsion-free invertible module . Hence the kernel is exactly the torsion submodule of and the quotient by it is invertible.
If is an integral model dominating , then is invertible as the pullback of an invertible sheaf, the pullback of the identification presents modulo torsion as the invertible sheaf , and the same argument on integral affine charts applies verbatim.
The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited from the blowup and resolution suppliers; no general flattening or Fitting theorem is used.
Remarks
- The ideal produced here is a fractional-ideal representative of the rank-one module; the normalisation by the denominator is unique only up to a nonzero scalar, which does not affect the blowup.
- The statement is intrinsic: the torsion of the pullback vanishes exactly when the pullback is already invertible, and the quotient by torsion is the maximal torsion-free quotient.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper
- The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Sections 54.8–54.9: complete source arguments with local prerequisite replacements (standard reference, not scraped)