How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Strict positive and conditionally positive augmented interpolation systems are invertible
Statement
Let be a finite ordered list of distinct sites in . If is strictly positive definite, then is invertible and has a unique solution for every . If is strictly conditionally positive definite of order and is -unisolvent for , then the augmented matrix in Radial kernels, polynomial augmentation, and site geometry is invertible and its system has a unique solution for every right-hand side.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite distinct site list , a real radial kernel, and either strict positive definiteness or strict conditional positive definiteness of order together with -unisolvent sites.
Strict positive definiteness means for every nonzero on distinct sites. (Radial kernels, polynomial augmentation, and site geometry)
Strict conditional positive definiteness means for each nonzero with ; -unisolvence means has linearly independent columns. (Radial kernels, polynomial augmentation, and site geometry)
For a linear map with finite-dimensional domain, dimension equals nullity plus rank. (Rank-nullity: )
The real numbers form a field. (The reals form a field)
A real square matrix is invertible when it has a two-sided matrix inverse. (Invertible matrices and the general linear group )
Proof
Given: The hypotheses above, with and, in the augmented case, .
In the strictly positive definite case, if , then , so [F1] forces . Thus the linear map has zero kernel.
In the augmented case, put and suppose . The lower block gives , and multiplying the upper block by gives . Since , strict conditional positivity [F2] forces .
By [F3], the map has rank , so it is onto as well as one-to-one. For the standard basis , choose with and let have columns . Then ; for every , injectivity of applied to gives . Thus is a two-sided inverse by [F5], and every system has a unique solution.
With , the upper block reduces to . The columns of are linearly independent by [F2], so . The augmented square matrix therefore has zero kernel, and [F3] gives rank and surjectivity. For the standard basis of , choose the unique preimage of each basis vector and use those preimages as columns of a matrix . Then ; injectivity gives by applying to . Hence is invertible by [F5], and its system has a unique solution for every right-hand side.
Depends on
Used by
- Exact augmented RBF-FD weights for a local differential functional Algorithm
- Augmented RBF-FD weights reproduce polynomials and obey a local Taylor bound Theorem
- Native Matérn interpolation is an orthogonal projection with power function Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Radial kernels, polynomial augmentation, and site geometry.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Narcowich, Ward, and Wendland, Sobolev bounds on functions with scattered zeros, Math. Comp. 74 (2005), §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gregory E. Fasshauer, MATH 590: Meshfree Methods, Chapter 13, pp. 18–25 (standard reference, not scraped)