Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strict positive and conditionally positive augmented interpolation systems are invertible

Statement

Let X=(x1,…,xN) be a finite ordered list of distinct sites in Rd. If K is strictly positive definite, then KX is invertible and KXa=y has a unique solution for every y∈RN. If K is strictly conditionally positive definite of order m and X is m-unisolvent for Πm−1(Rd), then the augmented matrix in Radial kernels, polynomial augmentation, and site geometry is invertible and its system has a unique solution for every right-hand side.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite distinct site list X, a real radial kernel, and either strict positive definiteness or strict conditional positive definiteness of order m together with m-unisolvent sites.

[F1]

Strict positive definiteness means cTKXc>0 for every nonzero c on distinct sites. (Radial kernels, polynomial augmentation, and site geometry)

[F2]

Strict conditional positive definiteness means cTKXc>0 for each nonzero c with PXTc=0; m-unisolvence means PX has linearly independent columns. (Radial kernels, polynomial augmentation, and site geometry)

[F3]

For a linear map with finite-dimensional domain, dimension equals nullity plus rank. (Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T)

[F4]

The real numbers form a field. (The reals form a field)

[F5]

A real square matrix is invertible when it has a two-sided matrix inverse. (Invertible matrices and the general linear group GL⁡n(F))

Proof

Given: The hypotheses above, with KX∈RN×N and, in the augmented case, PX∈RN×J.

1.1F1algebra

In the strictly positive definite case, if KXa=0, then aTKXa=0, so [F1] forces a=0. Thus the linear map a↦KXa has zero kernel.

1.2F2algebra

In the augmented case, put M=[KXPXPXT0] and suppose M[ab]=0. The lower block gives PXTa=0, and multiplying the upper block by aT gives aTKXa+aTPXb=0. Since aTPX=(PXTa)T=0, strict conditional positivity [F2] forces a=0.

2.1step 1.1F3F4F5algebrachoose

By [F3], the map a↦KXa has rank N, so it is onto RN as well as one-to-one. For the standard basis e1,…,eN, choose vj with KXvj=ej and let B have columns vj. Then KXB=IN; for every x, injectivity of KX applied to KX(BKXx−x)=0 gives BKXx=x. Thus B is a two-sided inverse by [F5], and every system KXa=y has a unique solution.

3.1step 1.2F2F3F4F5algebrachoose∎

With a=0, the upper block reduces to PXb=0. The columns of PX are linearly independent by [F2], so b=0. The augmented square matrix therefore has zero kernel, and [F3] gives rank N+J and surjectivity. For the standard basis of RN+J, choose the unique preimage of each basis vector and use those preimages as columns of a matrix B. Then MB=IN+J; injectivity gives BM=IN+J by applying M to BMx−x. Hence M is invertible by [F5], and its system has a unique solution for every right-hand side.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Radial kernels, polynomial augmentation, and site geometry.

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources