Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact augmented RBF-FD weights for a local differential functional

Definition

The exact augmented RBF finite-difference weight procedure has the following inputs: a dimension d≥1; an integer polynomial degree r≥0; a finite ordered stencil Y=(y1,…,yN)⊂Rd of distinct sites that is (r+1)-unisolvent for Πr(Rd); a real kernel K strictly conditionally positive definite of order r+1; an ordered basis p1,…,pJ of Πr(Rd); a center x∈Rd; a homogeneous constant-coefficient differential functional L=∑∣α∣=tcαDα with 0≤t≤r; and a neighborhood of x on which every section z↦K(z,yi) has continuous derivatives through order t. Here α∈N0d, ∣α∣=∑jαj, and Dα is the corresponding partial derivative. All arithmetic in this procedure is exact real arithmetic.

The input is supplied with total, correct oracles for admissibility and exact evaluation. The admissibility oracle returns whether all the stated input conditions hold, including the polynomial-basis condition, global strict conditional positive definiteness, and continuous section differentiability on the supplied neighborhood. On an affirmative answer, the evaluation oracles return the exact real values K(yi,yj), pj(yi), (LzK(z,yi))∣z=x, and (Lpj)(x) for the finitely many requested indices. Oracle calls are primitive operations in this model; neither global kernel admissibility nor differentiation is claimed to be decidable by real arithmetic alone.

Query the admissibility oracle. If it returns false, return inadmissible-input. Otherwise use the evaluation oracles to form Pij=pj(yi), bi=(LzK(z,yi))∣z=x, ℓj=(Lpj)(x), and M=[KYPPT0],g=[bell]. Solve Mz=g by exact Gaussian elimination with deterministic nonzero-pivot row selection: set A=M, c=g, and n=N+J. For k=1,…,n, choose the least i≥k with Aik≠0; if none exists, return singular-system. Swap rows i and k in both A and c. For each j=k+1,…,n in increasing order, set μ=Ajk/Akk, replace row j by row j−μ rowk in A and c, and set Ajk=0. After all pivots, set zn=cn/Ann; then, for k=n−1,n−2,…,1 in decreasing order, set zk=(ck−∑j=k+1nAkjzj)/Akk. Return success with the first N coordinates w of z and the remaining J polynomial multipliers. The stated strict hypotheses imply that singular-system is unreachable, as proved by Strict positive and conditionally positive augmented interpolation systems are invertible.

The returned w is an exact mathematical weight vector. The nonsingularity lemma Strict positive and conditionally positive augmented interpolation systems are invertible makes singular-system unreachable for every input that passes the stated strict hypotheses. This definition makes no floating-point stability or solver-error claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources