How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Radial kernels, polynomial augmentation, and site geometry
Definition
Fix an integer . An admitted domain is a nonempty bounded Lipschitz domain (its boundary is locally the graph of a Lipschitz function, with on one side) with fixed and such that for every there is an orthogonal map for which An orthogonal map is a real linear map with , equivalently one preserving the Euclidean inner product. The map may depend on ; no simultaneous selection of the maps is part of this definition.
A real radial kernel on has the form for a function . For a finite ordered list of distinct sites , its Gram matrix is . The kernel is strictly positive definite if for every such and every nonzero ; the nonstrict positive-semidefinite condition replaces by . Only strict positivity is used for the ordinary interpolation solve below.
For an integer , let be the real polynomials of total degree at most , with an ordered basis , where . The evaluation matrix on is . The sites are -unisolvent for this polynomial space when has linearly independent columns. A kernel is strictly conditionally positive definite of order when, for every finite distinct and this evaluation matrix, for every nonzero satisfying . Thus strict conditional positivity is a strict inequality on the moment-null subspace; it is stronger than the corresponding nonstrict inequality.
For data , the strictly positive definite interpolation system is . For an order- strictly conditionally positive definite kernel and -unisolvent sites, the polynomially augmented interpolation system is Whenever the relevant system has a unique solution, its kernel-plus-polynomial function is called the interpolant. Invertibility for the stated strict hypotheses is supplied by Strict positive and conditionally positive augmented interpolation systems are invertible ↗.
For a finite nonempty site set , the fill distance is . If , the separation radius and mesh ratio are and , respectively. These are exact geometric quantities, independent of any floating-point solver.
Used by
- Exact augmented RBF-FD weights for a local differential functional Algorithm
- Bounded mesh ratio gives an h⁻²ˢ exact condition-number bound Corollary
- Fourier Bessel-potential and restriction-quotient Sobolev spaces Definition
- The normalized Matérn kernel in the 2π Fourier convention Definition
- A small fill distance can coexist with poor separation and conditioning Example
- A smooth scattered surface inherits the Matérn fill-distance rate Example
- Duplicate sites make the kernel Gram matrix singular Example
- A Sobolev function vanishing on scattered sites has an h^ν bound Lemma
- Separated Matérn sites have a positive Gram lower bound Lemma
- Strict positive and conditionally positive augmented interpolation systems are invertible Lemma
- The Matérn native space has its weighted Fourier norm and strict Gram positivity Lemma
- The restricted Matérn native space is the Sobolev quotient space Lemma
- Uniform cone domains admit stable polynomial norming stencils Lemma
- Augmented RBF-FD weights reproduce polynomials and obey a local Taylor bound Theorem
- Matérn interpolation and its power function converge at rate h^ν Theorem
- Native Matérn interpolation is an orthogonal projection with power function Theorem
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Narcowich, Ward, and Wendland, Sobolev bounds on functions with scattered zeros, Math. Comp. 74 (2005), §§1 and 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Rasmussen and Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)