Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The weighted Fourier model is an injective Hilbert representation

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as a conservative cover of the published L2 completeness dependency, which declares it in its transitive dependencies although its statement requires only Countable Choice. For every s>d/2, each g∈Ls2(Rd) lies in L1(Rd), its inverse Fourier representative Ug is bounded and continuous, the map g↦Ug is injective, and the whole-space Fourier Bessel-potential space of Fourier Bessel-potential and restriction-quotient Sobolev spaces is a complex Hilbert space. In particular, for a constant Cd,s<∞, ∣Ug(x)∣≤Cd,s∥g∥Ls2(x∈Rd).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, an integer d≥1, a real s>d/2, and g∈Ls2(Rd).

[F1]

The weighted Fourier norm is ∥g∥Ls22=∫(1+∣ξ∣2)s∣g(ξ)∣2dξ, and Ug(x)=∫g(ξ)e2πix⋅ξdξ. (Fourier Bessel-potential and restriction-quotient Sobolev spaces)

[F2]

Cauchy--Schwarz holds in L2(λd). (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2)

[F3]

The integral ∫Rd(1+∣ξ∣2)−sdξ is finite when s>d/2, by polar coordinates. (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma)

[F4]

The Matérn calculation supplies the d-dimensional Gaussian Fourier transform and its normalized Gaussian Gϵ(y)=ϵ−d/2e−π∣y∣2/ϵ of integral one. (The Matérn spectral integral, normalization, and radial formula)

[F5]

Fubini/Tonelli applies to the absolute integrals on completed product measure spaces. (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability)

[F7]

Increasing nonnegative integrals converge to the integral of their pointwise limit, and dominated convergence applies under an integrable majorant. (Monotone convergence for the integral, Dominated convergence)

[F8]

L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space under Countable Choice. Its declared transitive dependencies include the Axiom of Choice. (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice)

[F9]

A nonnegative measurable function has integral zero exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere. (A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere)

[A1]

Full AC is carried conservatively to match the legacy transitive dependency of the published L2 Hilbert-space item; the Fourier injectivity argument itself is choice-free. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof technique: direct.

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement and the Fourier convention in [F1].

1.1F1F2F3F7

Write Ws(ξ)=(1+∣ξ∣2)s/2. By [F2] and [F3], ∫∣g(ξ)∣dξ≤(∫Ws(ξ)2∣g(ξ)∣2dξ)1/2(∫Ws(ξ)−2dξ)1/2<∞. Hence Ug is bounded by ∥g∥1 and continuous by [F7] applied to the pointwise-continuous exponential integrand dominated by ∣g∣. The same estimate gives the displayed evaluation bound with Cd,s=∥Ws−1∥2.

1.2F4F7algebra

The kernels Gϵ are nonnegative and have integral one by [F4]. For each fixed δ>0, scaling y=ϵz and [F7] show ∫∣y∣≥δGϵ(y)dy=∫∣z∣≥δ/ϵe−π∣z∣2dz⟶0(ϵ↓0).

2.1F4F5step 1.1

Suppose Ug(x)=0 for every x. For ϵ>0 and η∈Rd, the double integral of ∣g(ξ)∣e−πϵ∣x∣2 is finite by step 1.1 and [F4]. Thus [F5] and [F4] give 0=∫Ug(x)e−πϵ∣x∣2e−2πix⋅ηdx=∫g(ξ)ϵ−d/2e−π∣ξ−η∣2/ϵdξ=(g∗Gϵ)(η).

2.2F5F6step 1.2algebra

Given τ>0, translation continuity [F6] supplies δ>0 such that ∥g(⋅−y)−g∥1<τ when ∣y∣<δ. Tonelli and the triangle inequality then give ∥g∗Gϵ−g∥1≤∫Gϵ(y)∥g(⋅−y)−g∥1dy≤τ+2∥g∥1∫∣y∣≥δGϵ(y)dy. Step 1.2 makes the last term tend to zero; as τ was arbitrary, g∗Gϵ→g in L1.

3.1F9step 2.1step 2.2

Step 2.1 says g∗Gϵ=0 for every ϵ, whereas step 2.2 says these convolutions converge to g in L1. Hence ∥g∥1=0, so ∫∣g∣=0 and [F9] gives g=0 almost everywhere. This proves injectivity.

4.1F1F8A1step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

Multiplication g↦Wsg is a linear isometry of the weighted Ls2 space onto ordinary complex L2(λd), with inverse h↦Ws−1h. By [F8] the latter is Hilbert under the declared choice assumption. Step 3.1 makes the inverse Fourier image isometric and one-to-one, so the whole-space Hs is Hilbert; step 1.1 makes its restriction quotient norm positive on nonzero functions.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Fourier Bessel-potential and restriction-quotient Sobolev spaces.

Dependency tree · two levels

78 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources