How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Inverse norm bound for a regularized Gram matrix
Statement
Let be symmetric matrices such that and for every , where , and let . Write for the identity matrix, , and . For vectors use , and for a matrix use the induced Euclidean norm . Positive definite means for every nonzero , and analogously for . Then and are positive definite and invertible, , and
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Symmetric positive-semidefinite matrices and .
A non-negative operator is equivalently self-adjoint with nonnegative eigenvalues, a positive semidefinite matrix in an orthonormal basis, or an operator of the form S^*S: every finite-dimensional real symmetric positive-semidefinite operator has an orthonormal eigenbasis and nonnegative eigenvalues.
Proof
Since and are positive semidefinite, every nonzero satisfies and . Thus and are positive definite and invertible. By [F1], write with orthogonal and each . Then and ; applying the same diagonalization argument to gives the corresponding formula for .
Orthogonality of gives for every . Taking the supremum over unit vectors gives ; the identical calculation for gives .
Since , multiplying out yields . For every unit vector , the definition of the induced norm gives . Taking the supremum and using step 2.1 proves the asserted resolvent bound.
Depends on
Used by
- Finite-budget Nyström kernel ridge fit with residual status Algorithm
- Kernel ridge systems with singular and zero Gram matrices Example
- Statistical and numerical limits of finite kernel solve guarantees Remark
- Kernel ridge predictions are stable under Gram-matrix perturbations Theorem
- Kernel ridge residuals certify coefficient and training prediction errors Theorem
- The kernel ridge system uniquely minimizes the mean-square RKHS objective Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sheldon Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right, 4th ed., §§7B–7C (standard reference, not scraped)