Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Inverse norm bound for a regularized Gram matrix

Statement

Let M,N∈Rn×n be symmetric matrices such that xTMx≥0 and xTNx≥0 for every x∈Rn, where n≥1, and let τ>0. Write In for the identity matrix, A=M+τIn, and B=N+τIn. For vectors use ∥x∥2=(∑ixi2)1/2, and for a matrix T use the induced Euclidean norm ∥T∥2=sup⁡∥x∥2=1∥Tx∥2. Positive definite means xTAx>0 for every nonzero x, and analogously for B. Then A and B are positive definite and invertible, ∥A−1∥2,∥B−1∥2≤1/τ, and

A−1−B−1=A−1(N−M)B−1,∥A−1−B−1∥2≤∥M−N∥2τ2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Symmetric positive-semidefinite matrices M,N∈Rn×n and τ>0.

[F1]

A non-negative operator is equivalently self-adjoint with nonnegative eigenvalues, a positive semidefinite matrix in an orthonormal basis, or an operator of the form S^*S: every finite-dimensional real symmetric positive-semidefinite operator has an orthonormal eigenbasis and nonnegative eigenvalues.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Since τ>0 and M,N are positive semidefinite, every nonzero x satisfies xTAx=xTMx+τ∥x∥22≥τ∥x∥22>0 and xTBx=xTNx+τ∥x∥22≥τ∥x∥22>0. Thus A and B are positive definite and invertible. By [F1], write M=Udiag⁡(μ1,…,μn)UT with U orthogonal and each μi≥0. Then A=Udiag⁡(μi+τ)UT and A−1=Udiag⁡((μi+τ)−1)UT; applying the same diagonalization argument to N gives the corresponding formula for B−1.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

Orthogonality of U gives ∥A−1x∥22=∑i(UTx)i2(μi+τ)−2≤τ−2∥x∥22 for every x. Taking the supremum over unit vectors gives ∥A−1∥2≤1/τ; the identical calculation for N gives ∥B−1∥2≤1/τ.

3.1givenstep 2.1algebra∎

Since B−A=N−M, multiplying out yields A−1(B−A)B−1=A−1−B−1. For every unit vector x, the definition of the induced norm gives ∥A−1(N−M)B−1x∥2≤∥A−1∥2∥N−M∥2∥B−1∥2. Taking the supremum and using step 2.1 proves the asserted resolvent bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources