How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The kernel ridge system uniquely minimizes the mean-square RKHS objective
Statement
Let be a set, let be a real positive-semidefinite kernel, and let be a real reproducing-kernel Hilbert space with kernel . Take a finite ordered list with , a response vector , and . Put and . Define , , and . Then is the unique minimizer over of
and its training evaluation vector is .
Statement references
Positive semidefinite kernels and reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces: A real RKHS contains each kernel section and satisfies .
Regularized kernel prediction system: The coefficient and fitted vectors are defined by and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The kernel, RKHS, training list, response vector, and regularization parameter in the Statement.
Positive semidefinite kernels and reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces: each section belongs to and ; every finite Gram matrix of is symmetric positive semidefinite.
Regularized kernel prediction system: , the objective is the mean-square loss plus , and .
Inverse norm bound for a regularized Gram matrix: for and , is invertible.
Proof
By [F1], is a real symmetric positive-semidefinite matrix. Let , which exists by [F2]–[F3], and set . The reproducing identities give , so if , then by .
Fix any . The reproducing identities yield . Expanding both squared norms in gives . Substituting cancels the two cross terms, leaving .
Step 2.1 shows for every , so is a minimizer. Equality forces , hence because ; the minimizer is unique. The evaluation computation in step 1.1 gives its fitted vector .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Carl Edward Rasmussen and Christopher K. I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, Chapter 6 §6.2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Per-Gunnar Martinsson and Joel A. Tropp, Randomized Numerical Linear Algebra: Foundations & Algorithms, §19.1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)