Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The kernel ridge system uniquely minimizes the mean-square RKHS objective

Statement

Let X be a set, let k:X×X→R be a real positive-semidefinite kernel, and let H be a real reproducing-kernel Hilbert space with kernel k. Take a finite ordered list X=(xi)i=1n with n≥1, a response vector y∈Rn, and λ>0. Put K=(k(xi,xj))i,j=1n and τ=nλ. Define a=(K+τIn)−1y, f0=∑i=1naik(⋅,xi), and u=Ka. Then f0 is the unique minimizer over f∈H of

J(f)=1n∑i=1n(yi−f(xi))2+λ∥f∥H2,

and its training evaluation vector is u=y−τa.

Statement references

Positive semidefinite kernels and reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces: A real RKHS contains each kernel section and satisfies ⟨f,k(⋅,x)⟩H=f(x).

Regularized kernel prediction system: The coefficient and fitted vectors are defined by a=(K+τI)−1y and u=Ka=y−τa.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The kernel, RKHS, training list, response vector, and regularization parameter in the Statement.

[F1]

Positive semidefinite kernels and reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces: each section k(⋅,xi) belongs to H and ⟨f,k(⋅,xi)⟩H=f(xi); every finite Gram matrix of k is symmetric positive semidefinite.

[F2]

Regularized kernel prediction system: τ=nλ, the objective is the mean-square loss plus λ∥f∥H2, and a=(K+τIn)−1y.

[F3]

Inverse norm bound for a regularized Gram matrix: for K⪰0 and τ>0, K+τIn is invertible.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3constructalgebra

By [F1], K is a real symmetric positive-semidefinite matrix. Let a=(K+τIn)−1y, which exists by [F2]–[F3], and set f0=∑iaik(⋅,xi). The reproducing identities give f0(xj)=∑iaik(xj,xi)=(Ka)j, so if r=y−(f0(xi))i=1n, then r=y−Ka=τa by (K+τIn)a=y.

2.1givenstep 1.1F1F2algebra

Fix any h∈H. The reproducing identities yield ⟨f0,h⟩H=∑iaih(xi)=aT(h(xi))i=1n. Expanding both squared norms in J(f0+h)−J(f0) gives 1n∥(h(xi))i=1n∥22−2nrT(h(xi))i=1n+2λaT(h(xi))i=1n+λ∥h∥H2. Substituting r=τa=nλa cancels the two cross terms, leaving 1n∥(h(xi))∥22+λ∥h∥H2≥0.

3.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Step 2.1 shows J(f0+h)≥J(f0) for every h, so f0 is a minimizer. Equality forces λ∥h∥H2=0, hence h=0 because λ>0; the minimizer is unique. The evaluation computation in step 1.1 gives its fitted vector u=Ka=y−τa.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources