How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Restriction to a containing p subgroup retains a vertex
Statement
Let be finite, a field of characteristic , and a nonzero indecomposable finite-dimensional -module with vertex and source at . If and is a -subgroup, then has a nonzero indecomposable direct summand for which itself is a vertex.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group, field, module, vertex, source and containing -subgroup in the statement.
A source is an indecomposable summand on restriction which induces a module containing ; vertices are minimal relative-projectivity subgroups. (A vertex is a minimal p-subgroup for relative projectivity, and a source is an indecomposable inducing summand there)
Vertices of an indecomposable module are conjugate in its ambient group. (Vertices exist for indecomposable modules, are conjugate in G, and sources are conjugate by the appropriate normalizer)
Mackey restriction has intersection subgroups; indecomposable extraction and induction transitivity preserve the stated relative-projectivity witnesses. (Relative projectivity mackey intersections for finite modules)
Indecomposable finite-dimensional summands can be extracted from a finite decomposition. (Finite-dimensional kG-modules decompose as finite direct sums of indecomposables uniquely up to order and isomorphism)
Relative projectivity supplies a split induction counit from the restriction to that subgroup. (Higman's criterion characterizes relative projectivity through the relative trace idempotent test)
Proof
Write to mean that is a direct summand of . The source cannot be relatively -projective for any : otherwise transitivity of induction and make relatively -projective, contrary to minimality of its vertex . Hence , as a -module, has full vertex .
Decompose into nonzero indecomposables. Since , [F4] gives one with . This uses finite decomposition after further restricting each , not an assertion that its restriction is indecomposable.
Restrict the split inclusion to . The selected is a summand of its right side. Mackey and indecomposable extraction in [F3] supply an for which is relatively -projective. In particular .
Choose an inclusion-minimal subgroup of relative to which is projective. The set is finite and nonempty since it includes . Any proper subgroup of would also be a subgroup of , so this minimality makes a vertex of . Thus . Put ; [F5] gives .
Restrict this last splitting to and use step 1.2. Then . A second Mackey decomposition and indecomposable extraction give such that is relatively -projective as a -module. Step 1.1 forces , so .
Now implies . Conjugating a split induction witness inside preserves its splitting and minimality, and the inner conjugate of a -module is isomorphic to itself by multiplication by . Thus this conjugate of the vertex is itself a vertex of the same , consistently with [F2]. This is the claimed literal subgroup , without changing by an outside conjugation.
Sources
Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, §§11.3, 11.6 and 12.3–12.5, especially pp.240–245. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.
Depends on
- A vertex is a minimal p-subgroup for relative projectivity, and a source is an indecomposable inducing summand there
- Vertices exist for indecomposable modules, are conjugate in G, and sources are conjugate by the appropriate normalizer
- Relative projectivity mackey intersections for finite modules
- Finite-dimensional kG-modules decompose as finite direct sums of indecomposables uniquely up to order and isomorphism
- Higman's criterion characterizes relative projectivity through the relative trace idempotent test
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, §§11.3, 11.6 and 12.3–12.5, especially pp.240–245 (standard reference, not scraped)