How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-dimensional kG-modules decompose as finite direct sums of indecomposables uniquely up to order and isomorphism
Statement
Every finite-dimensional module over a finite-dimensional algebra is a finite direct sum of indecomposable modules, and the multiset of indecomposable summands is unique up to isomorphism and permutation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional left module over a finite-dimensional algebra.
Dimensions add across finite direct sums, and rank-nullity holds for linear endomorphisms (If with every finite-dimensional, then is finite-dimensional and ; in particular , Rank-nullity: ).
Finite direct sums have coordinate inclusions and projections; the endomorphisms of a module form a ring (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules, The endomorphism ring under addition and composition).
Proof
Prove existence by induction on . If or is indecomposable there is nothing to split. Otherwise with both summands nonzero. By dimension additivity, for each , so the induction hypothesis decomposes each into finitely many indecomposables. Their combined list decomposes .
Let be a nonzero indecomposable finite-dimensional module and . The dimensions of increase and are bounded by , so for some , . If lies in , then and . Rank-nullity therefore gives . Both are submodules. Indecomposability makes one summand zero: in the first case is injective and hence invertible in finite dimension; in the second . Thus every endomorphism of is invertible or nilpotent.
A nilpotent has inverse for . If nonunits of had unit sum , then and would still be nonunits and would sum to ; the first is nilpotent by step 1.2, so the second would be a unit, a contradiction. Thus the nonunits are closed under finite sums. This is the only endomorphism-ring property needed below; no commutativity is assumed.
For uniqueness induct on . Suppose , with and all nonzero indecomposable. The identity of is the sum of composites . By step 2.1 at least one is a unit. Write its two factors as and , so is invertible. Then splits the surjection , giving . Indecomposability of forces , hence and is an isomorphism.
Put . Since the projection restricts to the isomorphism , the projection restricts to an isomorphism : its kernel is , and for every subtract from the unique with the same -projection to obtain a preimage in . Thus . Both have dimension smaller than ; induction matches their indecomposable decompositions. Adding proves uniqueness up to permutation and isomorphism.
Depends on
- The direct sum of an indexed family of modules
- The endomorphism ring $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ under addition and composition
- Rank-nullity: $\dim_F V=\operatorname{nullity}T+\operatorname{rank}T$
- If $V = \bigoplus_{i<n} U_i$ with every $U_i$ finite-dimensional, then $V$ is finite-dimensional and $\dim_F V = \sum_{i<n} \dim_F U_i$; in particular $\dim_F(U \oplus W) = \dim_F U + \dim_F W$
Used by
- The regular module is a direct sum of the projective covers of the simple modules, with the split-field multiplicities Corollary
- A block induced from a subgroup Definition
- A projective simple in a symmetric block forces a matrix block Lemma
- Block centre locality and trace ideal sums Lemma
- Block defect is an intersection of two sylow subgroups Lemma
- Centralizer containment makes block induction well-defined Lemma
- Green distinguished summands are mutually inverse Lemma
- Green induction has one distinguished summand Lemma
- Green mackey intersections force proper vertices Lemma
- Green restriction has one distinguished summand Lemma
- Green vertex retention and inducing lift Lemma
- Relative projectivity mackey intersections for finite modules Lemma
- Restriction to a containing p subgroup retains a vertex Lemma
- Tensoring preserves relative projectivity for finite-group modules Lemma
- Brauer–Green block compatibility Theorem
- Indecomposable projective classes form a basis of split K0 Theorem
- Vertices exist for indecomposable modules, are conjugate in G, and sources are conjugate by the appropriate normalizer Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory (23 Feb 2016 draft) (standard reference, not scraped)