How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Indecomposable projective kG-modules correspond to simple modules through taking the head
Statement
For a finite-dimensional algebra , sending an indecomposable finite-dimensional projective module to its head induces a bijection between isomorphism classes of indecomposable finite-dimensional projective modules and isomorphism classes of simple finite-dimensional modules. The inverse sends a simple module to its projective cover.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional algebra .
Every finite-dimensional module has a projective cover, unique up to isomorphism over the target (Every finite-dimensional module has a projective cover, unique up to isomorphism over the target).
The head of a module is the quotient by its radical (The radical, socle, head, and Loewy series of a finite-dimensional module).
The radical of a finite-length module is superfluous (For a finite-length module, the radical is a superfluous submodule).
Proof
Let be the projective cover of a simple module . If , then , so simplicity forces one summand, say , to equal . Then , and because is superfluous in a projective cover, . Hence , so the projective cover of a simple module is indecomposable.
Now let be an indecomposable finite-dimensional projective module. The quotient map is a projective cover because its kernel is , which is superfluous by [L2]. Write the semisimple head as a direct sum of simple modules . Taking the direct sum of the projective covers of the gives another projective cover of . By uniqueness in [L1], that direct sum is isomorphic to . Since is indecomposable, one must have . Thus is simple.
Step 1.1 constructs an indecomposable projective from each simple module, and step 2.1 shows that taking the head of an indecomposable projective returns a simple module. The two constructions are inverse up to isomorphism by uniqueness of projective covers.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory (23 Feb 2016 draft) (standard reference, not scraped)