How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Indecomposable projective kG-modules correspond to simple modules through taking the head
Statement
For a finite-dimensional algebra , sending an indecomposable finite-dimensional projective module to its head induces a bijection between isomorphism classes of indecomposable finite-dimensional projective modules and isomorphism classes of simple finite-dimensional modules. The inverse sends a simple module to its projective cover.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional algebra .
Every finite-dimensional module has a projective cover, unique up to isomorphism over the target (Every finite-dimensional module has a projective cover, unique up to isomorphism over the target).
The head of a module is the quotient by its radical (The radical, socle, head, and Loewy series of a finite-dimensional module).
The radical of a finite-length module is superfluous (For a finite-length module, the radical is a superfluous submodule).
For a finite-dimensional algebra , the quotient is semisimple (For a finite-dimensional algebra, the Jacobson radical is nilpotent and the quotient by it is semisimple).
A semisimple module is a direct sum of simple submodules (Semisimple modules as direct sums of simple modules).
Proof
Let be the projective cover of a simple module . If , then , so simplicity forces one summand, say , to equal . Then , and because is superfluous in a projective cover, . Hence , so the projective cover of a simple module is indecomposable.
Now let be an indecomposable finite-dimensional projective module, and put . The quotient map is a projective cover: its kernel is by [F1], and that kernel is superfluous by [L2]. The head is nonzero, since otherwise the superfluity condition applied with the zero submodule would force . It is a finite-dimensional module over the semisimple algebra by [L3]. Choose finitely many vector-space generators to make it a quotient of a finite sum of copies of . By [L3] and [F2], that sum is a finite direct sum of simple modules. Its quotient is likewise a finite direct sum of simples: process the summands in order; the image of each is zero or simple, and either lies in the sum of earlier images or meets that sum trivially, so retain exactly the latter images. Thus for some .
For each , let be its finite-dimensional projective cover from [L1], with kernel . The finite direct sum is projective by lifting one component at a time, and is surjective with kernel . Each is superfluous. If a maximal submodule of omitted , their sum would equal , a contradiction; hence by [F1]. Therefore , and [L2] makes superfluous because is finite-dimensional. Thus is a projective cover of the head. Uniqueness in [L1] gives . Each because it surjects onto ; indecomposability of therefore forces . Thus the head is simple.
Step 1.1 constructs an indecomposable projective from each simple module, and steps 1.2–2.1 show that taking the head of an indecomposable projective returns a simple module. The two constructions are inverse up to isomorphism by uniqueness of projective covers.
Depends on
- Every finite-dimensional module has a projective cover, unique up to isomorphism over the target
- The radical, socle, head, and Loewy series of a finite-dimensional module
- For a finite-length module, the radical is a superfluous submodule
- For a finite-dimensional algebra, the Jacobson radical is nilpotent and the quotient by it is semisimple
- Semisimple modules as direct sums of simple modules
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory (23 Feb 2016 draft) (standard reference, not scraped)