How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a finite-dimensional algebra, the Jacobson radical is nilpotent and the quotient by it is semisimple
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional algebra over a field and let . Then is nilpotent, and the quotient algebra is semisimple.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional algebra and its Jacobson radical .
The Jacobson radical is the intersection of the maximal left ideals (The Jacobson radical of a finite-dimensional algebra is the intersection of its maximal left ideals).
A strict chain of submodules of a finite-dimensional module strictly changes vector-space dimension, so ascending and descending chains are finite. A composition series can be built by repeatedly choosing a nonzero submodule of least positive dimension in a quotient; each choice is from a finite set of possible dimensions. [algebra]
Every nonzero finite-dimensional module has a maximal proper submodule: among proper submodules choose one with largest vector-space dimension; ensures the candidate dimensions are nonempty, and strict containment would increase dimension. [algebra]
A simple module is a nonzero module with no proper nonzero submodule (Simple module: a nonzero module with no proper nonzero submodule).
A unital ring is semisimple when its left regular module is semisimple (A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple).
Proof
The left regular module is finite-dimensional, so [L1] makes the descending chain stabilize: choose with . If , [L2] gives a maximal submodule of the finite-dimensional left -module , so is simple by [L3]. For every nonzero , the map , , is onto; its kernel is a maximal left ideal, hence contains by [F1]. Thus for every , so and , contradicting . Therefore , so is nilpotent.
Maximal left ideals of are exactly the quotients with a maximal left ideal of containing , so their intersection is by [F1]. Let be the left regular module. It is finite-dimensional. We prove by induction on vector-space dimension that any finite-dimensional module whose maximal submodules intersect trivially is semisimple. If there is nothing to prove. Otherwise choose a nonzero submodule of least positive dimension, so is simple. Since the intersection of maximal submodules is , some maximal submodule does not contain . Then , and maximality makes a nonzero submodule of the simple quotient , so . For any nonzero , choose a maximal submodule of avoiding . The image of in the simple module is nonzero and hence all of , so is a maximal submodule of avoiding . Thus the maximal submodules of also intersect trivially. Its dimension is smaller than that of , so induction makes semisimple, hence so is .
By step 1.2, the left regular module of is semisimple. Thus [L4] makes the quotient algebra semisimple. Together with step 1.1, this proves the theorem.
Depends on
Used by
- The regular module is a direct sum of the projective covers of the simple modules, with the split-field multiplicities Corollary
- An integer cyclic presentation descends the simple-head generator line Lemma
- Central Hecke Jucys–Murphy scalars separate q-Schur residue contents Lemma
- Characteristic-zero scalar extension of geometric semisimplicity Lemma
- Nonzero-form cellular heads, cell purity and shared-factor linkage Lemma
- Rational descent of a complex monodromy socle Lemma
- Temperley–Lieb cell forms detect semisimplicity over the complex numbers Lemma
- The trace form detects semisimplicity over the complex numbers Lemma
- For a finite group and a field of characteristic p, the group algebra is local exactly when the group is a p-group Theorem
- For a finite-dimensional algebra, the module radical is exactly the action of the Jacobson radical Theorem
- Indecomposable projective kG-modules correspond to simple modules through taking the head Theorem
- Ordinary Specht modules are the signed conjugate Murphy cells Theorem
- Over a finite-dimensional algebra, a module annihilated modulo its radical is zero, and generators lift from the head Theorem
- q-Schur Weyl modules are in the same block iff their labels have the same e-core Theorem
- The Hecke Jucys-Murphy action is dominance triangular Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory (23 Feb 2016 draft) (standard reference, not scraped)