Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Characteristic-zero scalar extension of geometric semisimplicity

Statement

Let S be connected and let VQ be a finite-rank rational local system (Local systems and pullback). If VQ⊗C is semisimple, then VQ⊗k is semisimple for every characteristic-zero field k (Semisimple modules as direct sums of simple modules). In particular this applies to rational Gauss-Manin local systems after complex geometric semisimplicity has been proved. The field k need not embed in C. Semisimplicity means that every monodromy-invariant subspace has an invariant complement, equivalently that the monodromy module is a finite direct sum of simple modules.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A connected base S. Work on each path component separately, fixing a point s in that component and the finite-dimensional Q-vector space V=VQ,s with its monodromy action, so that invariant subspaces of V are exactly the submodules of the monodromy module and semisimplicity on this path component is semisimplicity of that module (Local systems and pullback).

[F1]

For a finite-dimensional algebra over a field the Jacobson radical J is a nilpotent two-sided ideal and the quotient algebra is semisimple (For a finite-dimensional algebra, the Jacobson radical is nilpotent and the quotient by it is semisimple); a unital ring is semisimple exactly when its left regular module is a direct sum of simple modules (A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple).

[F2]

Over C the regular trace form (b,c)=tr⁡(Lbc) is nondegenerate if and only if B is semisimple; if B is semisimple then B≅∏iMdi(C) and the trace form is the sum of the nondegenerate matrix trace pairings (The trace form detects semisimplicity over the complex numbers).

[F3]

A nilpotent endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space has a strictly upper-triangular matrix in some ordered basis, hence trace zero (Characterisations of a nilpotent endomorphism).

[F4]

For a finite-length module, sum-of-simples, direct-sum and invariant-complement characterizations of semisimplicity are equivalent (Choice-free semisimple characterizations for finite-length modules), and semisimple means an internal direct sum of simple submodules, the empty sum included (Semisimple modules as direct sums of simple modules).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Let A⊆End⁡Q(V) be the Q-span of the monodromy matrices. It contains the identity and is closed under multiplication, because a product of monodromy matrices is a monodromy matrix, so it is a finite-dimensional unital Q-algebra. For every field E over Q the canonical map A⊗QE→End⁡E(V⊗QE) is injective: rationally independent matrices stay independent after extending scalars, as one sees by comparing coordinates in a rational basis of V. Its image is the E-span of the monodromy matrices, so submodules for this image are exactly the monodromy-invariant subspaces of V⊗QE; in particular the action of AC=A⊗QC on VC is faithful.

2.1F1F4step 1.1algebra

Assume VC is semisimple. Let J=J(AC). If T⊆VC is a simple submodule, then JT is a submodule equal to 0 or T, and JT=T would give JkT=T for every k≥1, contradicting the nilpotence of J from [F1]. Hence J kills every simple summand of VC and therefore kills all of VC, since a semisimple module is a direct sum of simple submodules by [F4]. Faithfulness of the action, established in step 1.1, then forces J=0: an element of J acts as zero on VC. Therefore AC is semisimple.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra

Choose the rational basis a1,…,ad of A and let T=(tr⁡(Laiaj))i,j be the Gram matrix of the regular trace form of A in this basis. Its entries are rational: passing from A to AC extends the rational matrix of left multiplication by aiaj to a complex matrix with the same trace. By step 2.1 and [F2] the regular trace form of AC is nondegenerate, so det⁡T≠0 as a complex number, and since det⁡T∈Q it is a nonzero rational number. For every field k the scalar extension Q↪k therefore makes T, viewed over k, a nondegenerate matrix. No embedding of k into C is used.

4.1F1F3step 3.1algebra

Let k be any characteristic-zero field and put Ak=A⊗Qk. For x∈J(Ak) and b∈Ak the product xb lies in the nilpotent ideal J(Ak) by [F1], so (xb)n=0 for some n and the endomorphism Lxb of Ak is nilpotent; by [F3] its trace vanishes. Nondegeneracy of the extended matrix T from step 3.1 then forces x=0, so J(Ak)=0. By [F1] the quotient Ak/J(Ak)=Ak is a semisimple ring.

5.1F1F4step 1.1step 4.1algebra∎

Finally Vk=V⊗Qk is semisimple over Ak. Choose a Q-basis v1,…,vd of V. The map (Ak)d→Vk, (x1,…,xd)↦∑ixivi, is a surjective Ak-module homomorphism, and the regular module of the semisimple ring Ak is a direct sum of simple modules by [F1]. Hence Vk is a sum of images of simple modules, each of which is simple or zero, and Vk has finite length over k; by [F4] it is a finite direct sum of simple modules, that is, semisimple. By step 1.1 this is exactly semisimplicity of the monodromy module, equivalently every invariant subspace has an invariant complement by [F4], which is semisimplicity of the local system VQ⊗k. The zero fiber is the empty direct sum and is included.

Source notes

The scalar-extension argument is supplied locally from the complex regular-trace criterion of [F2]; it does not appeal to an unproved separable-algebra theorem and it never embeds the coefficient field k into C. The reduction is the one used in Deligne II 4.2.6 to pass from complex to rational coefficients.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources