Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact smooth projective pushforwards have semisimple perverse cohomology in characteristic zero

Statement

Assume the inherited Axiom of Choice. Let f:X→Y be a projective morphism of complex projective varieties, X smooth of pure complex dimension n, and let k be any characteristic-zero coefficient field. Then Rf∗kX[n] is a finite direct sum of shifts of simple perverse sheaves on Y; equivalently all its perverse cohomology objects are semisimple and it splits into their shifted sum. This holds without any assumption that k embeds in C.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The projective morphism f:X→Y of complex projective varieties with X smooth of pure complex dimension n, the characteristic-zero coefficient field k with its canonical inclusion of Q, and the Axiom of Choice inherited from the suppliers.

[F1]

The rational compact projective theorem Relative hard Lefschetz and perverse splitting for compact projective algebraic maps gives a finite perverse splitting of Rf∗QX[n], the IC description of its perverse cohomology objects with simple rational local systems, and semisimplicity of the complexifications of those rational local systems.

[F2]

A finite-rank rational local system whose complexification is semisimple remains semisimple after extension of scalars to every characteristic-zero field, by Characteristic-zero scalar extension of geometric semisimplicity.

[F3]

Ordinary constructible six operations, including proper pushforward and Verdier duality, commute with field extension by Actual analytic constructible sheaves admit coherent six operations. Exact field extension preserves the perverse upper support bounds, and its compatibility with duality preserves the lower bounds, so it is perverse-exact. Uniqueness of truncation triangles then gives compatibility with perverse truncation. On the hearts it preserves images, hence also the image of pH0j!→pH0Rj∗ defining intermediate extension. These deductions use the ordinary perverse structure of [F4].

[F4]

Simple perverse sheaves are the intersection complexes of simple finite-rank local systems on smooth dense opens of irreducible supports, and the IC construction is additive in the local system, by Ordinary middle perverse t structure, recollement and intersection complexes.

Proof

Given: The map, source, coefficient field and suppliers of the Statement and Facts.

1.1F1F3F4givenconstruct

The canonical inclusion Q↪k makes the constant sheaf kX the scalar extension of QX. Applying the constructible coefficient comparison of [F3] to the finite splitting of [F1] gives a finite splitting of Rf∗kX[n] into scalar-extended perverse cohomology objects, each of them a finite sum of scalar extensions of rational IC objects; the commuting of scalar extension with intermediate extension included in [F3] identifies each of these with the IC object of the scalar-extended rational local system.

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1∎

The rational local systems of [F1] have semisimple complexification, so [F2] makes their extensions to k finite semisimple local systems. Decomposing each of them into finitely many simple local-system constituents and applying the additive IC construction of [F4] produces finitely many simple perverse sheaves on Y. Combined with the finite splitting of step 1.1 this exhibits Rf∗kX[n] as a finite direct sum of shifts of simple perverse sheaves, equivalently it shows that every perverse cohomology object is semisimple and that the complex splits into their shifted sum. At no point is an embedding of k into C used, and no semisimplicity is inferred from rational simplicity alone: the complexified clause of [F1] is the indispensable input.

Remarks

The ordinary coefficient comparison [F3] derives perverse-truncation and intermediate-extension compatibility from the ordinary six operations and the perverse-heart item [F4]. Proof step 2.1 of Equivariant constructible Ext is degreewise finite and compatible with characteristic zero scalars uses the same ordinary argument before transporting it to equivariant objects. The present reduction uses the rational compact projective theorem and scalar-extension lemma of [F1] and [F2], and no embedding of k into C enters.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources