Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Characterisations of a nilpotent endomorphism

Statement

Let N be an endomorphism of a nonzero n-dimensional vector space over F. The following are equivalent:

  1. N is nilpotent;
  2. μN=xr for some 1≤r≤n;
  3. χN=xn;
  4. some ordered basis gives N a strictly upper-triangular matrix.

In that case r is the nilpotency index.

The nonzero hypothesis is needed for condition 2. On the zero space the unique endomorphism N=0 is nilpotent with nilpotency index 1, and μN=χN=1=x0 while the empty matrix is strictly upper triangular; so conditions 1, 3 and 4 hold there, but condition 2 fails, since no integer r satisfies 1≤r≤0. The exponent 0 of μN is then not the nilpotency index 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An endomorphism N of a finite-dimensional F-vector space V, with n=dim⁡V.

[L1]

A polynomial p annihilates an endomorphism exactly when its minimal polynomial divides p; on the zero space the minimal polynomial is 1 (The annihilator ideal is nonzero and has a unique monic generator; p(T)=0 if and only if μT∣p).

[L2]

The minimal and characteristic polynomials have exactly the same monic irreducible factors (The minimal and characteristic polynomials have exactly the same monic irreducible factors).

[L3]

An endomorphism is triangularisable exactly when its characteristic polynomial splits (T is triangularisable iff its minimal polynomial splits iff its characteristic polynomial splits).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L5

Suppose n>0. By [L1], Nk=0 for some positive k exactly when μN∣xk, which is exactly when μN=xr for some positive r; [L5] then bounds the least such r by n once χN=xn.

1.2L2L4L5

If μN=xr, [L2] says that x is the only irreducible factor of χN, and [L4] forces χN=xn; conversely χN=xn and [L5] give Nn=0.

2.1step 1.2L3algebra

If N is nilpotent, step 1.2 makes χN split, so [L3] gives an upper-triangular matrix; its diagonal entries are roots of χN=xn, hence are all zero, making it strictly upper triangular. Conversely, the nth power of a strictly upper-triangular n×n matrix is zero.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1L1L4∎

For V=0, [L1] and [L4] give μN=χN=1=x0, the unique empty matrix is strictly upper triangular, and the convention in Nilpotent endomorphisms and their nilpotency index gives index 1, so conditions 1, 3 and 4 hold; condition 2 asks for r with 1≤r≤0 and no such integer exists, and the exponent 0 of μN differs from the index 1, which is why the equivalence is stated for n>0. Together with steps 1.1-2.1 this proves every asserted case.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources