Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Indecomposable projective classes form a basis of split K0

Statement

Let A be a finite-dimensional unital algebra over a field k. Write S1,…,St for representatives of the isomorphism classes of simple left A-modules, and choose a finite-dimensional projective cover qi ⁣:Pi↠Si for each i. Then the split Grothendieck group of finite-dimensional projective left A-modules (Split Grothendieck group of an additive category) is the free abelian group with basis [P1],…,[Pt]. In particular, each selected cover is indecomposable, the Pi are pairwise nonisomorphic, and every finite dimensional projective is a finite direct sum of them. This result makes no claim that the Cartan map to the short-exact-sequence group G0(A) is invertible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-dimensional unital k-algebra A over a field k; all modules considered are unital left modules. A projective cover is an ordinary module cover, so its kernel is superfluous among all submodules. The local Fitting input below is applied only after giving A and the relevant module the trivial grading. Only finitely many simple classes and finitely many covers are selected; no axiom of choice is used.

[F1]

The split Grothendieck group is defined using direct-sum relations only; for finite-dimensional algebras, K0(A) denotes this group on finite-dimensional projective left modules (Split Grothendieck group of an additive category).

[F2]

Every finite-dimensional left A-module has a projective cover, and any two projective covers of the same target are isomorphic over that target (Every finite-dimensional module has a projective cover, unique up to isomorphism over the target).

[F3]

A projective cover is a surjection with superfluous kernel; thus N+ker⁡q=P implies N=P (An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map).

[F4]

A projective module lifts maps through surjective module homomorphisms (Projective modules and the lifting property).

[F5]

A simple module is nonzero and has no proper nonzero submodule (Simple module: a nonzero module with no proper nonzero submodule).

[F6]

Every finite-dimensional module decomposes as a finite direct sum of indecomposables, uniquely up to isomorphism and permutation (Finite-dimensional kG-modules decompose as finite direct sums of indecomposables uniquely up to order and isomorphism).

[F7]

For a nonzero finite-dimensional graded-indecomposable module over a finite-dimensional graded algebra, every degree-zero endomorphism is invertible or nilpotent (Graded Fitting decomposition for degree-zero endomorphisms).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F5givenchooseconstructalgebra

By induction on dimension, the regular left module A has a finite composition series 0=A0⊊A1⊊⋯⊊An=A: for a nonzero finite-dimensional module, choose a proper submodule of maximal dimension and continue with it. For any simple left module S, choose 0≠s∈S; the map A→S, a↦as, is nonzero and hence surjective. If j is the least index with the image of Aj nonzero, then Aj−1 maps to zero and Aj maps onto S. Thus the induced map Aj/Aj−1→S is an isomorphism of simple modules. Consequently every simple is finite-dimensional and every simple isomorphism class occurs among the finitely many factors of this fixed series.

1.2F5givenchoosealgebra

Let P≠0 be a finite-dimensional indecomposable projective. Among its proper submodules choose one, K, of maximal k-dimension; such a submodule exists because 0<P and the possible dimensions are finite. Then P/K is nonzero and has no proper nonzero submodule, so it is simple by [F5]. Let p ⁣:P↠P/K be the quotient map.

2.1F2F3step 1.1chooseconstructalgebra

Let S1,…,St represent those finitely many isomorphism classes. For each Si, choose a projective cover qi ⁣:Qi↠Si using [F2]. These sources are finite-dimensional: choose a finite k-basis of Si and lift its vectors to Qi. The submodule Qi0 generated by those lifts is finite-dimensional, since it is an image of a finite direct sum of copies of A, and qi(Qi0)=Si. Hence Qi=Qi0+ker⁡qi; [F3] gives Qi=Qi0.

3.1F3F5step 2.1algebracases

Fix i and write Ki=ker⁡qi. If Qi=U⊕V with both summands nonzero, at least one of qi(U) or qi(V) is nonzero; by simplicity of Si, that image is all of Si. Say it is qi(U). Then U+Ki=Qi, so superfluity of Ki forces U=Qi, contradicting V≠0. Thus each Qi is indecomposable.

4.1F3F5step 3.1algebra

Suppose p ⁣:Q↠S and r ⁣:Q↠T are surjections to simple modules, with superfluous kernels K and L. If r(K)≠0, simplicity gives r(K)=T; then for each x∈Q some y∈K has r(y)=r(x), whence x−y∈L and K+L=Q. Superfluity of L would give K=Q, impossible since p is surjective onto the nonzero module S. Therefore K⊆L; interchanging p and r gives L⊆K. The equal kernels identify S≅Q/K≅T. In particular, the Qi are pairwise nonisomorphic: transporting a cover map across any proposed isomorphism would give two such simple quotients of one source.

5.1F2F3F4F7step 1.2step 4.1constructalgebra

Suppose N≤P and N+K=P. Then p∣N ⁣:N↠P/K is surjective. By projectivity [F4], it lifts p to a map h ⁣:P→N; after inclusion into P, this gives f∈End⁡A(P) with pf=p, hence pfm=p for every m≥1. Regard A and P as concentrated in degree zero. Every submodule of P is then graded, so its ordinary indecomposability makes it graded-indecomposable, and f is degree-zero. By [F7], f is invertible or nilpotent. Nilpotence is impossible because p≠0 and pfm=p for every m; therefore f is invertible. Since f(P)⊆N, this forces N=P. Thus K is superfluous and p is a projective cover by [F3]. If P/K≅Si, compose p with such an isomorphism; uniqueness in [F2] identifies P with Qi over Si. Therefore every nonzero indecomposable finite-dimensional projective is isomorphic to exactly one Qi.

6.1F4F6step 4.1step 5.1algebra

By [F6], any finite-dimensional projective Q is a finite direct sum of indecomposable modules. Each summand remains projective: precompose a map from the summand with the projection from Q, lift through the given surjection using projectivity of Q, and restrict the lift to the summand. Each summand is finite-dimensional, so step 5.1 identifies it with one of the Qi. Step 4.1 makes those types distinct, and uniqueness in [F6] makes the multiplicities mi(Q) uniquely determined. The zero projective has the empty sum.

7.1F1F6step 6.1constructalgebra∎

Let Z(t) be the free abelian group with basis e1,…,et, and define Φ(ei)=[Qi]. Step 6.1 makes Φ surjective. Send the free generator of the split group for each isomorphism class [Q] to ∑imi(Q)ei; uniqueness and additivity of the multiplicities under direct sum, from [F6], make this assignment respect each relation [Q⊕R]=[Q]+[R] from [F1]. It therefore descends to a map Ψ ⁣:K0split(proj⁡A)→Z(t). The two maps are inverse: ΨΦ(ei)=ei, and the decomposition in step 6.1 plus [F1] gives ΦΨ([Q])=[Q] for every generator. Hence the classes [Qi] form a free abelian basis. No step asserts that the Cartan map to G0(A) is invertible.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources