How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Indecomposable projective classes form a basis of split K0
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional unital algebra over a field . Write for representatives of the isomorphism classes of simple left -modules, and choose a finite-dimensional projective cover for each . Then the split Grothendieck group of finite-dimensional projective left -modules (Split Grothendieck group of an additive category) is the free abelian group with basis . In particular, each selected cover is indecomposable, the are pairwise nonisomorphic, and every finite dimensional projective is a finite direct sum of them. This result makes no claim that the Cartan map to the short-exact-sequence group is invertible.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional unital -algebra over a field ; all modules considered are unital left modules. A projective cover is an ordinary module cover, so its kernel is superfluous among all submodules. The local Fitting input below is applied only after giving and the relevant module the trivial grading. Only finitely many simple classes and finitely many covers are selected; no axiom of choice is used.
The split Grothendieck group is defined using direct-sum relations only; for finite-dimensional algebras, denotes this group on finite-dimensional projective left modules (Split Grothendieck group of an additive category).
Every finite-dimensional left -module has a projective cover, and any two projective covers of the same target are isomorphic over that target (Every finite-dimensional module has a projective cover, unique up to isomorphism over the target).
A projective cover is a surjection with superfluous kernel; thus implies (An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map).
A projective module lifts maps through surjective module homomorphisms (Projective modules and the lifting property).
A simple module is nonzero and has no proper nonzero submodule (Simple module: a nonzero module with no proper nonzero submodule).
Every finite-dimensional module decomposes as a finite direct sum of indecomposables, uniquely up to isomorphism and permutation (Finite-dimensional kG-modules decompose as finite direct sums of indecomposables uniquely up to order and isomorphism).
For a nonzero finite-dimensional graded-indecomposable module over a finite-dimensional graded algebra, every degree-zero endomorphism is invertible or nilpotent (Graded Fitting decomposition for degree-zero endomorphisms).
Proof
By induction on dimension, the regular left module has a finite composition series : for a nonzero finite-dimensional module, choose a proper submodule of maximal dimension and continue with it. For any simple left module , choose ; the map , , is nonzero and hence surjective. If is the least index with the image of nonzero, then maps to zero and maps onto . Thus the induced map is an isomorphism of simple modules. Consequently every simple is finite-dimensional and every simple isomorphism class occurs among the finitely many factors of this fixed series.
Let be a finite-dimensional indecomposable projective. Among its proper submodules choose one, , of maximal -dimension; such a submodule exists because and the possible dimensions are finite. Then is nonzero and has no proper nonzero submodule, so it is simple by [F5]. Let be the quotient map.
Let represent those finitely many isomorphism classes. For each , choose a projective cover using [F2]. These sources are finite-dimensional: choose a finite -basis of and lift its vectors to . The submodule generated by those lifts is finite-dimensional, since it is an image of a finite direct sum of copies of , and . Hence ; [F3] gives .
Fix and write . If with both summands nonzero, at least one of or is nonzero; by simplicity of , that image is all of . Say it is . Then , so superfluity of forces , contradicting . Thus each is indecomposable.
Suppose and are surjections to simple modules, with superfluous kernels and . If , simplicity gives ; then for each some has , whence and . Superfluity of would give , impossible since is surjective onto the nonzero module . Therefore ; interchanging and gives . The equal kernels identify . In particular, the are pairwise nonisomorphic: transporting a cover map across any proposed isomorphism would give two such simple quotients of one source.
Suppose and . Then is surjective. By projectivity [F4], it lifts to a map ; after inclusion into , this gives with , hence for every . Regard and as concentrated in degree zero. Every submodule of is then graded, so its ordinary indecomposability makes it graded-indecomposable, and is degree-zero. By [F7], is invertible or nilpotent. Nilpotence is impossible because and for every ; therefore is invertible. Since , this forces . Thus is superfluous and is a projective cover by [F3]. If , compose with such an isomorphism; uniqueness in [F2] identifies with over . Therefore every nonzero indecomposable finite-dimensional projective is isomorphic to exactly one .
By [F6], any finite-dimensional projective is a finite direct sum of indecomposable modules. Each summand remains projective: precompose a map from the summand with the projection from , lift through the given surjection using projectivity of , and restrict the lift to the summand. Each summand is finite-dimensional, so step 5.1 identifies it with one of the . Step 4.1 makes those types distinct, and uniqueness in [F6] makes the multiplicities uniquely determined. The zero projective has the empty sum.
Let be the free abelian group with basis , and define . Step 6.1 makes surjective. Send the free generator of the split group for each isomorphism class to ; uniqueness and additivity of the multiplicities under direct sum, from [F6], make this assignment respect each relation from [F1]. It therefore descends to a map . The two maps are inverse: , and the decomposition in step 6.1 plus [F1] gives for every generator. Hence the classes form a free abelian basis. No step asserts that the Cartan map to is invertible.
Depends on
- Split Grothendieck group of an additive category
- Simple module: a nonzero module with no proper nonzero submodule
- Projective modules and the lifting property
- An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map
- Every finite-dimensional module has a projective cover, unique up to isomorphism over the target
- Graded Fitting decomposition for degree-zero endomorphisms
- Finite-dimensional kG-modules decompose as finite direct sums of indecomposables uniquely up to order and isomorphism
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles Weibel, The K-book, Chapter II, §§1–2 and 5–6 (standard reference, not scraped)