Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Graded Fitting decomposition for degree-zero endomorphisms

Statement

Let A be a finite-dimensional Z-graded algebra over a field k, M a finite-dimensional graded left A-module, and f ⁣:M→M a degree-zero endomorphism. There is an n≥1 for which ker⁡(fn) and im⁡(fn) are graded submodules and M=ker⁡(fn)⊕im⁡(fn). Moreover, if M is nonzero and graded-indecomposable (it has no decomposition into two nonzero graded submodules), then every degree-zero endomorphism of M is invertible or nilpotent. The nonunits of End⁡A,0(M) form a proper two-sided ideal, hence the unique maximal left and right ideal of this possibly noncommutative ring.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The field, graded algebra, module, and map in the Statement. The indecomposable and endomorphism-ring conclusions additionally assume that M≠0 and has no nontrivial graded direct-sum decomposition. No axiom of choice is used; the only selection is one stabilization index for two specific finite-dimensional chains.

Source relation: Leinster's ungraded finite-dimensional Fitting lemma and indecomposable-endomorphism corollary supply the base result; the preservation of grading and the nonunit-ideal conclusion are established here. Kleshchev supplies only the grading conventions.

[L1]

For degree-zero maps of graded modules, kernels and images are computed in each homogeneous degree (Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category).

[L2]

If T ⁣:V→W is linear and V is finite-dimensional, then dim⁡V=dim⁡ker⁡T+dim⁡im⁡T (Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T).

[L3]

The endomorphism ring uses pointwise addition and composition as multiplication, with the identity map as its unit (The endomorphism ring End⁡R(M) under addition and composition).

[L4]

These operations make the endomorphisms of a module a unital ring (Module endomorphisms form a ring under pointwise addition and composition).

[L5]

A two-sided ideal is an additive subgroup closed under multiplication by arbitrary ring elements on both the left and the right (Left, right and two-sided ideals).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L3L4givenalgebra

The degree-zero endomorphisms of M are closed under pointwise addition, additive inverses, and composition, and contain 1M, because each such map preserves every Md. Thus R:=End⁡A,0(M) is a unital subring of End⁡A(M), whose ring operations are those of [L3] and [L4].

1.2L1given

The kernels ker⁡(fm) form an increasing sequence of subspaces and the images im⁡(fm) form a decreasing sequence. Finite-dimensionality makes both sequences stabilize; choose n≥1 after stabilization, so ker⁡(fn)=ker⁡(f2n) and im⁡(fn)=im⁡(fn+1). Since each fn is degree-zero, [L1] makes these stabilized subspaces graded A-submodules.

2.1L2step 1.2algebra

If x∈ker⁡(fn)∩im⁡(fn), write x=fn(y). Then f2n(y)=fn(x)=0, so stabilization gives y∈ker⁡(f2n)=ker⁡(fn) and hence x=0. By [L2] applied to fn, the two submodules have dimensions summing to dim⁡kM; their zero intersection therefore gives M=ker⁡(fn)⊕im⁡(fn). For M=0 this reads 0=0⊕0; for f=0 it reads M=M⊕0, and for invertible f it reads M=0⊕M.

2.2step 1.1givenalgebra

Now suppose M≠0 and let N be the set of nonunits of R. It contains 0, and −a∈N whenever a∈N. If ra were invertible, a would be injective; if ar were invertible, a would be surjective. Since M is finite-dimensional, either property makes a bijective, with degree-zero A-linear inverse. Thus N absorbs multiplication on both sides by every r∈R.

3.1step 2.1givenalgebracases

Suppose in addition that M is graded-indecomposable. The decomposition in step 2.1 forces ker⁡(fn)=0 or im⁡(fn)=0. In the first case f is injective, hence bijective by finite-dimensionality; its inverse is again degree-zero and A-linear. In the second case fn=0. Thus f is invertible or nilpotent, and every nonunit is nilpotent. This includes the zero endomorphism in the nilpotent case. If dim⁡kM=1, nonzero indecomposability is automatic because two nonzero graded direct summands would have total dimension at least two.

4.1step 3.1algebra

If f is a nonunit and fm=0, then 1−f has two-sided inverse 1+f+⋯+fm−1. Hence for each f∈R, at least one of f and 1−f is invertible.

5.1L5step 4.1step 2.2algebra∎

If a,b∈N but u=a+b were invertible, then x=u−1a and 1−x=u−1b would both be nonunits: otherwise a=ux or b=u(1−x) would be invertible. This contradicts step 4.1. Therefore N is closed under addition; together with step 2.2 and [L5], it is a two-sided ideal. It is proper because 1M is a unit. Every proper left or right ideal contains no unit and is therefore contained in N, so N is the unique maximal left ideal and the unique maximal right ideal.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources