How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Graded Fitting decomposition for degree-zero endomorphisms
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional -graded algebra over a field , a finite-dimensional graded left -module, and a degree-zero endomorphism. There is an for which and are graded submodules and . Moreover, if is nonzero and graded-indecomposable (it has no decomposition into two nonzero graded submodules), then every degree-zero endomorphism of is invertible or nilpotent. The nonunits of form a proper two-sided ideal, hence the unique maximal left and right ideal of this possibly noncommutative ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field, graded algebra, module, and map in the Statement. The indecomposable and endomorphism-ring conclusions additionally assume that and has no nontrivial graded direct-sum decomposition. No axiom of choice is used; the only selection is one stabilization index for two specific finite-dimensional chains.
Source relation: Leinster's ungraded finite-dimensional Fitting lemma and indecomposable-endomorphism corollary supply the base result; the preservation of grading and the nonunit-ideal conclusion are established here. Kleshchev supplies only the grading conventions.
For degree-zero maps of graded modules, kernels and images are computed in each homogeneous degree (Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category).
If is linear and is finite-dimensional, then (Rank-nullity: ).
The endomorphism ring uses pointwise addition and composition as multiplication, with the identity map as its unit (The endomorphism ring under addition and composition).
These operations make the endomorphisms of a module a unital ring (Module endomorphisms form a ring under pointwise addition and composition).
A two-sided ideal is an additive subgroup closed under multiplication by arbitrary ring elements on both the left and the right (Left, right and two-sided ideals).
Proof
The degree-zero endomorphisms of are closed under pointwise addition, additive inverses, and composition, and contain , because each such map preserves every . Thus is a unital subring of , whose ring operations are those of [L3] and [L4].
The kernels form an increasing sequence of subspaces and the images form a decreasing sequence. Finite-dimensionality makes both sequences stabilize; choose after stabilization, so and . Since each is degree-zero, [L1] makes these stabilized subspaces graded -submodules.
If , write . Then , so stabilization gives and hence . By [L2] applied to , the two submodules have dimensions summing to ; their zero intersection therefore gives . For this reads ; for it reads , and for invertible it reads .
Now suppose and let be the set of nonunits of . It contains , and whenever . If were invertible, would be injective; if were invertible, would be surjective. Since is finite-dimensional, either property makes bijective, with degree-zero -linear inverse. Thus absorbs multiplication on both sides by every .
Suppose in addition that is graded-indecomposable. The decomposition in step 2.1 forces or . In the first case is injective, hence bijective by finite-dimensionality; its inverse is again degree-zero and -linear. In the second case . Thus is invertible or nilpotent, and every nonunit is nilpotent. This includes the zero endomorphism in the nilpotent case. If , nonzero indecomposability is automatic because two nonzero graded direct summands would have total dimension at least two.
If is a nonunit and , then has two-sided inverse . Hence for each , at least one of and is invertible.
If but were invertible, then and would both be nonunits: otherwise or would be invertible. This contradicts step 4.1. Therefore is closed under addition; together with step 2.2 and [L5], it is a two-sided ideal. It is proper because is a unit. Every proper left or right ideal contains no unit and is therefore contained in , so is the unique maximal left ideal and the unique maximal right ideal.
Depends on
- Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category
- Rank-nullity: $\dim_F V=\operatorname{nullity}T+\operatorname{rank}T$
- The endomorphism ring $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ under addition and composition
- Module endomorphisms form a ring under pointwise addition and composition
- Left, right and two-sided ideals
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Leinster, The bijection between projective indecomposable and simple modules, arXiv:1410.3671v1, §3, Lemma 3.1 and Corollary 3.2 (ungraded finite-dimensional Fitting lemma and indecomposable endomorphism criterion; the degree-zero graded adaptation is proved here) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Kleshchev, Representation Theory of Symmetric Groups and Related Hecke Algebras, §2.2 (graded module conventions only) (standard reference, not scraped)