Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-dimensional graded algebras have graded projective covers

Statement

Let A be a finite-dimensional Z-graded k-algebra over a field, and let X be a finite-dimensional graded left A-module. There is a degree-zero epimorphism p ⁣:P↠X in GrMod⁡0(A) (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts) with P finite graded projective and K:=ker⁡p satisfying

N+K=P⟹N=P

for every graded submodule N≤P. We call such a map a finite graded projective cover; superfluity of its kernel is tested among graded submodules, as appropriate in GrMod⁡0(A) (An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map). Any two finite graded projective covers of X are isomorphic over X: if q ⁣:Q↠X is another, there is a degree-zero isomorphism ϕ ⁣:P→Q with qϕ=p (Finite graded projective modules). No positivity assumption on the grading of A is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-dimensional unital associative Z-graded k-algebra A over a field and a finite-dimensional graded left A-module X. The grading is arbitrary; no lower bound on its support is assumed. The construction uses only finite data and no axiom of choice.

Source relation: Webb's results give projective-cover existence and uniqueness for ordinary finite-dimensional modules. The construction here is adapted to GrMod⁡0(A), with finite graded projectivity and superfluity among graded submodules proved directly. Kleshchev supplies only grading and shift conventions.

[L1]

The internal shift is A{r}d=Ad−r; multiplication by a homogeneous generator gives a degree-zero map from the matching shift (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts).

[L2]

In GrMod⁡0(A), kernels, images, cokernels and exactness are computed degreewise (Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category).

[L3]

Finite graded projectives are exactly degree-zero direct summands of finite sums of shifts of A, and every such finite sum is projective (Finite graded projectives are finite shifted-free summands).

[L4]

A graded projective object lifts degree-zero maps through degree-zero epimorphisms (Finite graded projective modules).

[L5]

Finite graded projectives are finitely generated by homogeneous elements (Finite graded projective modules).

[L6]

The cited terminology defines an ordinary projective cover using a superfluous kernel; this item explicitly adopts the corresponding criterion relative to GrMod⁡0(A), testing only graded submodules (An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map).

[L7]

A degree-zero endomorphism of a finite-dimensional graded module has, for some n≥1, the graded Fitting decomposition M=ker⁡(fn)⊕im⁡(fn) (Graded Fitting decomposition for degree-zero endomorphisms).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1givenchoosealgebra

Choose a finite k-basis of X. Each basis vector has finitely many homogeneous components, and the collection of these components is a finite homogeneous generating family x1,…,xm. If X=0, take m=0.

2.1L1L2step 1.1construct

Write dj=deg⁡(xj) and set E:=⨁j=1mA{dj}. The map ϵ ⁣:E→X given on the jth shifted generator by 1j↦xj and extended by a1j↦axj is degree-zero by [L1], and is surjective by step 1.1. It is an epimorphism in GrMod⁡0(A) by [L2]. The empty case gives E=X=0.

3.1L3step 2.1choose

The family of graded direct summands Q of E for which ϵ∣Q ⁣:Q→X is surjective is nonempty because it contains E. Their dimensions lie in the finite set {0,1,…,dim⁡kE}, so choose such a P of minimum dimension and put p:=ϵ∣P. By [L3], P is finite graded projective. It is finite-dimensional because it is a submodule of the finite-dimensional E.

4.1L2L4step 3.1construct

Let K=ker⁡p and let N≤P be a graded submodule with N+K=P. Then p∣N ⁣:N→X is surjective, hence an epimorphism by [L2]. Since P is graded projective, [L4] lifts p through this map to a degree-zero h ⁣:P→N with (p∣N)h=p. After inclusion N↪P, this gives a degree-zero endomorphism f of P with pf=p, and therefore pfn=p for every n≥1.

5.1L2L6L7step 3.1step 4.1algebra

Apply [L7] to f: for some n≥1, P=ker⁡(fn)⊕im⁡(fn) by graded submodules. Since pfn=p, the restriction of p to im⁡(fn) is still surjective. This image is a graded direct summand of P, hence of E, so it is one of the candidates in step 3.1. Minimality gives dim⁡kP≤dim⁡kim⁡(fn); the reverse inequality follows from im⁡(fn)⊆P, so im⁡(fn)=P. As im⁡(fn)⊆im⁡(f)⊆N, it follows that N=P. Thus K is superfluous among graded submodules and, by the category-relative definition in the Statement (using the terminology of [L6]), p is a finite graded projective cover.

6.1L2L4L6step 5.1construct

Let p ⁣:P→X and q ⁣:Q→X be finite graded projective covers. By projectivity, there are degree-zero maps f ⁣:P→Q and g ⁣:Q→P with qf=p and pg=q. Then p(gf)=p, so P=gf(P)+ker⁡p. The image gf(P) is graded by [L2]; superfluity of ker⁡p gives gf(P)=P. Similarly, fg(Q)=Q.

7.1L5step 6.1givenalgebra∎

By [L5] the sources P,Q are finitely generated by homogeneous elements; since A is finite-dimensional, both are finite-dimensional over k. The surjective endomorphisms gf and fg from step 6.1 are therefore bijective. It follows that f is injective from injectivity of gf and surjective from surjectivity of fg. The inverse is A-linear; it preserves degrees because a homogeneous element's preimage can have no nonzero components in other degrees under an injective degree-zero map. Hence f is a degree-zero isomorphism and qf=p, proving uniqueness over X.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources