How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-dimensional graded algebras have graded projective covers
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional -graded -algebra over a field, and let be a finite-dimensional graded left -module. There is a degree-zero epimorphism in (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts) with finite graded projective and satisfying
for every graded submodule . We call such a map a finite graded projective cover; superfluity of its kernel is tested among graded submodules, as appropriate in (An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map). Any two finite graded projective covers of are isomorphic over : if is another, there is a degree-zero isomorphism with (Finite graded projective modules). No positivity assumption on the grading of is made.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional unital associative -graded -algebra over a field and a finite-dimensional graded left -module . The grading is arbitrary; no lower bound on its support is assumed. The construction uses only finite data and no axiom of choice.
Source relation: Webb's results give projective-cover existence and uniqueness for ordinary finite-dimensional modules. The construction here is adapted to , with finite graded projectivity and superfluity among graded submodules proved directly. Kleshchev supplies only grading and shift conventions.
The internal shift is ; multiplication by a homogeneous generator gives a degree-zero map from the matching shift (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts).
In , kernels, images, cokernels and exactness are computed degreewise (Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category).
Finite graded projectives are exactly degree-zero direct summands of finite sums of shifts of , and every such finite sum is projective (Finite graded projectives are finite shifted-free summands).
A graded projective object lifts degree-zero maps through degree-zero epimorphisms (Finite graded projective modules).
Finite graded projectives are finitely generated by homogeneous elements (Finite graded projective modules).
The cited terminology defines an ordinary projective cover using a superfluous kernel; this item explicitly adopts the corresponding criterion relative to , testing only graded submodules (An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map).
A degree-zero endomorphism of a finite-dimensional graded module has, for some , the graded Fitting decomposition (Graded Fitting decomposition for degree-zero endomorphisms).
Proof
Choose a finite -basis of . Each basis vector has finitely many homogeneous components, and the collection of these components is a finite homogeneous generating family . If , take .
Write and set . The map given on the th shifted generator by and extended by is degree-zero by [L1], and is surjective by step 1.1. It is an epimorphism in by [L2]. The empty case gives .
The family of graded direct summands of for which is surjective is nonempty because it contains . Their dimensions lie in the finite set , so choose such a of minimum dimension and put . By [L3], is finite graded projective. It is finite-dimensional because it is a submodule of the finite-dimensional .
Let and let be a graded submodule with . Then is surjective, hence an epimorphism by [L2]. Since is graded projective, [L4] lifts through this map to a degree-zero with . After inclusion , this gives a degree-zero endomorphism of with , and therefore for every .
Apply [L7] to : for some , by graded submodules. Since , the restriction of to is still surjective. This image is a graded direct summand of , hence of , so it is one of the candidates in step 3.1. Minimality gives ; the reverse inequality follows from , so . As , it follows that . Thus is superfluous among graded submodules and, by the category-relative definition in the Statement (using the terminology of [L6]), is a finite graded projective cover.
Let and be finite graded projective covers. By projectivity, there are degree-zero maps and with and . Then , so . The image is graded by [L2]; superfluity of gives . Similarly, .
By [L5] the sources are finitely generated by homogeneous elements; since is finite-dimensional, both are finite-dimensional over . The surjective endomorphisms and from step 6.1 are therefore bijective. It follows that is injective from injectivity of and surjective from surjectivity of . The inverse is -linear; it preserves degrees because a homogeneous element's preimage can have no nonzero components in other degrees under an injective degree-zero map. Hence is a degree-zero isomorphism and , proving uniqueness over .
Depends on
- Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts
- Finite graded projective modules
- Finite graded projectives are finite shifted-free summands
- Graded Fitting decomposition for degree-zero endomorphisms
- Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category
- An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory (23 Feb 2016 draft), §7.3, Proposition 7.3.3(2) and Theorem 7.3.10 (ungraded projective-cover uniqueness and existence; the graded-category version is proved here) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Kleshchev, Representation Theory of Symmetric Groups and Related Hecke Algebras, §2.2 (grading and internal-shift conventions only) (standard reference, not scraped)