Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rough nonpolynomial activations are dense on compact sets

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let d≥1, let K⊆Rd be compact, and let σ∈Mpt not agree almost everywhere with any polynomial. Then the finite scalar single-hidden-layer networks with activation σ are uniformly dense in C(K,R).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, d≥1, compact K⊆Rd, σ∈Mpt nonpolynomial almost everywhere, f∈C(K,R), and ε>0.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the axiom used in the convolution and distribution suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Single-hidden-layer networks allow arbitrary affine hidden inputs and a linear output with bias (Single-hidden-layer network realization).

[F2]

If every compactly supported test convolution of σ were polynomial, then σ would be polynomial almost everywhere (Polynomial convolutions force activation polynomiality almost everywhere).

[F3]

Convolution of a locally integrable function with a test function is smooth (Convolution with a test function is smooth).

[F4]

A smooth nonpolynomial activation generates a uniformly dense network family on every compact subset of Rd (Smooth nonpolynomial activations are dense on compact sets).

[F5]

For a real test function and a compact interval, its real convolution with σ is a uniform limit of finite real translates of σ; this is the real-valued special case of the component conclusion for complex tests (Networks approximate smooth convolutions of the activation).

[F6]

The class Mpt consists of activations in M that are also pointwise locally bounded (Locally essentially bounded activations with null discontinuity closure).

Proof

1.1givenF2F3F6A1choose

By [F2] and the hypothesis on σ, some real test function φ∗ supported in [−1,1] has a nonpolynomial convolution g∗=σ∗φ∗. Indeed, if every real test had polynomial convolution, then for every complex test φ=φR+iφI both real convolutions would be polynomials, making every complex convolution polynomial; [F2] would then imply that σ is polynomial almost everywhere. By [F3], g∗ is smooth. The activation hypothesis has the content in [F6].

1.2givenF1F4A1choose

By [F4], choose a finite g∗-network G(x)=c+∑j=1majg∗(wj⋅x+bj) with sup⁡x∈K∣G(x)−f(x)∣<ε/2. For each j with aj≠0 and wj≠0, the set wj⋅K+bj is compact and lies in a compact interval Ij.

2.1step 1.2F1F5A1choosealgebra

By [F5], for each such j choose a finite sum of translates of σ uniformly within ε/(2(1+∑j=1m∣aj∣)) of g∗ on Ij. Composing with wj⋅x+bj gives a finite sum of units σ(wj⋅x+bj−t); units with wj=0 contribute only constants and are absorbed into the output bias. Summing the finitely many approximants yields a σ-network N with sup⁡K∣N−G∣<ε/2.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

The triangle inequality gives sup⁡K∣N−f∣≤sup⁡K∣N−G∣+sup⁡K∣G−f∣<ε. Hence the σ-network family is uniformly dense on K.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources