Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Schauder coefficient space is Banach

Statement

Let (en)n≥1 be a Schauder basis of the Banach space X. Let E be the vector space of scalar families a:N≥1→K, written (an)n≥1, for which ∑n=1∞anen converges, and set

∥a∥E:=sup⁡N≥0∥∑n=1Nanen∥.

Then E is a Banach space, and the summation map

S:E⟶X,Sa=∑n=1∞anen,

is a bounded linear bijection with ∥S∥≤1.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]
[L2]

Every x∈X has a unique norm-convergent expansion in (en) (Schauder basis and coordinate functionals).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1L2algebra

The displayed formula is a norm on E: definiteness follows because its [given, L2] value zero forces every partial sum, hence every coefficient since en≠0, to vanish. Linearity of E and the remaining norm axioms follow termwise from the norm axioms in X.

2.1L1algebra

Let (a(k)) be Cauchy in E. For fixed n, apply the nth coordinate [given, L1, step 1.1] map on span⁡{e1,…,en} to ∑j≤n(aj(k)−aj(ℓ))ej. By [L1], (an(k))k is Cauchy, so it has a scalar limit an.

3.1givenstep 2.1

Given ε>0, choose k0 so ∥a(k)−a(ℓ)∥E<ε for k,ℓ≥k0. Fix k≥k0 and N, and let ℓ→∞ in the finite sum. Coordinatewise convergence and continuity of finite sums give

∥∑n=1N(an(k)−an)en∥≤ε.

The estimate is uniform in N. [step 2.1, Cauchy, finite limit]

4.1step 3.1algebra

Fix k≥k0. Since a(k)∈E, its series has Cauchy tails. For [given, step 3.1] M>N, step 3.1 applied to the two partial sums bounds the corresponding finite block for a−a(k) by 2ε. Hence the partial sums for a are Cauchy in the Banach space X, so a∈E. Step 3.1 then yields ∥a(k)−a∥E≤ε; thus E is complete.

5.1L2algebra∎

For a∈E, norm continuity gives [given, L2, step 4.1] ∥Sa∥=lim⁡N∥∑n≤Nanen∥≤∥a∥E, so S is bounded. Surjectivity and injectivity are respectively existence and uniqueness in [L2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources