Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The shifted solution operator is compact on L2

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited through the compact-embedding supplier named below, together with Countable Choice. Let Ω⊆Rn be open and bounded, and let Kμ be the shifted solution operator of The shifted elliptic solution operator for a fixed μ≥β. Then Kμ, regarded as an operator on L2(Ω), is compact: ∥Kμf∥H01≤α−1∥f∥L2 (The Lax--Milgram solution operator has norm at most 1/α) and H01(Ω)↪L2(Ω) is compact (Compactness of W01,p(Ω)↪Lp(Ω) on bounded open sets at p=2), so Kμ maps bounded subsets of L2(Ω) to relatively compact subsets of L2(Ω). No regularity of ∂Ω is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice; a bounded open set Ω⊆Rn; a fixed μ≥β; the shifted solution operator Kμ:L2(Ω)→H01(Ω) with coercivity constant α=θ/2.

[F1]

Kμ is well defined and linear, and for every f∈L2(Ω) one has ∥Kμf∥H01≤α−1∥f∥L2 (The shifted elliptic solution operator, The Lax--Milgram solution operator has norm at most 1/α).

[F2]

H01(Ω)=W01,2(Ω), and for bounded open Ω the inclusion W01,2(Ω)↪L2(Ω) is compact: every sequence bounded in H01(Ω) has a subsequence converging in L2(Ω) (Compactness of W01,p(Ω)↪Lp(Ω) on bounded open sets, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

[F3]

Compositions: if T:X→Y is compact and B:Z→X is bounded linear, then T∘B:Z→Y is compact (Compositions with a compact operator are compact, Compact linear operator).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

The map Kμ:L2(Ω)→H01(Ω) is linear and bounded with operator bound ∥Kμ∥≤α−1 by [F1], so it maps bounded subsets of L2(Ω) to bounded subsets of H01(Ω).

1.2F2given

The inclusion ι:H01(Ω)→L2(Ω) is compact by [F2], because Ω is bounded and open and p=2 is admissible.

2.1F3step 1.1step 1.2given∎

The L2 realization of Kμ is the composite ι∘Kμ. By step 1.1 the first factor is bounded linear and by step 1.2 the second is compact, so [F3] makes the composite compact; hence bounded subsets of L2(Ω) are mapped into relatively compact subsets of L2(Ω). No boundary regularity was used, and the Axiom of Choice is inherited through the Rellich supplier [F2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources