Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Simultaneous ae uniqueness of regular conditional distributions

Statement

Assume AC for the countable determining-algebra supplier. If K,L are regular conditional distributions of the same standard-Borel-valued random element X given G, there is one NG with P(N)=0 such that K(ω,)=L(ω,) as measures for every ωN.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and conventions in the statement.

[F1]

Each event evaluation is a real bounded conditional-expectation version. Regular conditional distribution.

[F2]

The repaired in-batch standard-Borel construction supplies a countable algebra which generates the target sigma-algebra and determines finite measures. Existence of regular conditional distributions for standard borel targets.

[F3]

The repaired local integral interface is monotone and additive for nonnegative functions and positively homogeneous without a zero-times-infinity product. Simultaneous rational conditional distribution function versions.

[F4]

AC supplies real coding and the countable-choice algebra enumeration in the determining-algebra theorem. The Axiom of Choice.

[F5]

A countable union of measurable null sets is null. Finite and countable subadditivity of measures.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix the countable determining algebra A from [F2], whose AC hypothesis is [F4]. For AA, put u=K(,A) and v=L(,A). By [F1], both are [0,1]-valued and have equal integrals on every HG. For m1, the set Hm+={uv+1/m} belongs to G. Monotonicity, additivity and positive homogeneity from [F3] give Hm+udPHm+vdP+P(Hm+)/m. Equality of the two event integrals forces P(Hm+)=0. The same argument with u,v interchanged shows that {vu+1/m} is null. Their countable union is the measurable discrepancy set NA={uv}, so NA is null. This proves the needed scalar uniqueness locally, without importing conditional-expectation uniqueness.

F1F2F3F4F5
2.1

The set N=AANA is in G and null by countability and [F5]. For any ωN the two probability measures agree on every member of A. Their total masses are finite, so the locally supplied determination assertion [F2] yields equality on the entire target sigma-algebra. This gives a single exceptional set independent of the target event.

step 1.1F2F5

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources