Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth compactly supported tests are dense for finite Radon L2 measures

Statement

Assume Dependent Choice. Let M be a finite Radon Borel measure on Rn, where n≥1. Then Cc∞(Rn) is dense in L2(M).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: DC, a finite Radon measure M on Rn, and f∈L2(M).

[F3]

There exists a smooth compactly supported function of unit Lebesgue integral; its rescalings form a mollifier family, and convolution of a continuous compactly supported function with a mollifier is smooth. Euclidean spaces admit a smooth compactly supported unit-mass bump The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3

By [F1], given ϵ>0 choose g∈Cc(Rn) with ∥f−g∥L2(M)<ϵ/2. Extend g by zero on Rn; it is bounded and uniformly continuous. Let ρδ be the mollifier generated by [F3]. Since ρ has compact support, for some R<∞ its support is contained in BR(0), and sup⁡x∣(g∗ρδ)(x)−g(x)∣≤sup⁡∣z∣≤Rδ,x∣g(x−z)−g(x)∣⟶0 by uniform continuity.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1∎

The function g∗ρδ is smooth by [F2], and its support lies in the sum of the compact supports of g and ρδ, hence is compact. Since M is finite, ∥g∗ρδ−g∥L2(M)≤M(Rn)1/2∥g∗ρδ−g∥∞. Choose δ small enough that this is below ϵ/2 (if M is zero, every L2(M) class is zero and the conclusion is immediate). The triangle inequality gives ∥f−g∗ρδ∥L2(M)<ϵ, proving density.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources