Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Euclidean spaces admit a smooth compactly supported unit-mass bump

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. For every integer d≥1 there is a nonnegative function ρd:Rd→R with continuous partial derivatives of every order, support exactly [−1,1]d, strictly positive on (−1,1)d, and Lebesgue integral ∫Rdρd(x) dx=1. Here the support is the closure of the set where the function is nonzero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and an integer d≥1.

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed in the product-Lebesgue identification used in [F4]. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

For every integer N≥0, uNe−u→0 as u→+∞; therefore a polynomial in u times e−u tends to zero. The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, Euclidean Lebesgue measure on a finite product is the product of the coordinate Lebesgue measures, and Tonelli factors nonnegative product integrals. On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n} Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

Proof

1.1F1F2giveninduction

Define ϕ(t)=e−1/t for t>0 and ϕ(t)=0 for t≤0. For each k≥0, repeated chain and product rules give ϕ(k)(t)=Pk(1/t)e−1/t on t>0 for a polynomial Pk: it holds with P0=1, and if u=1/t then differentiation replaces Pk(u) by the polynomial u2(Pk(u)−Pk′(u)). By [F1], this derivative tends to 0 as t↓0. Its difference quotient at 0 is uPk(u)e−u with u=1/t, which also tends to 0 by [F1]; from the left it is zero. Induction therefore gives every derivative at 0 equal to 0 and continuous there, so ϕ is smooth on R.

2.1A1F2F3step 1.1

Set Φ(t)=ϕ(t+1)ϕ(1−t). By [F2], Φ is smooth. It vanishes for t∉[−1,1] and is positive for −1<t<1, so its support is [−1,1]. Let I=∫RΦ(t) dt. The extreme-value bound [F3] makes Φ bounded on [−1,1], so I<∞. Since Φ(0)=e−2>0, continuity gives δ∈(0,1) with Φ(t)≥e−2/2 on [−δ,δ]; [F3] gives I≥δe−2>0. Hence ψ=Φ/I is smooth, supported on [−1,1], positive on (−1,1), and has integral one.

3.1F2givenstep 2.1

Define ρd(x1,…,xd)=∏j=1dψ(xj). Repeated coordinatewise chain and product rules give every partial derivative as ∏j=1dψ(αj)(xj) for its multi-index α, so all partial derivatives are continuous. The function is nonnegative, vanishes outside [−1,1]d, and is positive at every point of (−1,1)d; therefore its support is exactly that closed cube.

4.1A1F4step 2.1step 3.1induction∎

For d=1, ∫ρ1=1 by step 2.1. By step 3.1, ρd is a nonnegative Borel function supported in the compact cube. For d≥2, split Rd=Rd−1×R. By [F4] and Tonelli, ∫ρd dx=(∫ρd−1 dx)(∫ψ dt); the second factor is 1 by step 2.1. Induction on d proves ∫Rdρd dx=1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources