Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Admissible parameters for the density recursion

Statement

Let be subreciprocal, 0<c<1/2, d>1. Set z=(c)1/2 and b=2log2(1z)>2. For 0<ϵ<c, put L=log2(1/ϵ), Q=log2(ϵ), x=21bϵ, p=z(x), and η=xd/4. Let t=2L/log2p, and δ=220bdL2/Q. Then t is the least natural number with ptϵ2 and 0<η<1,p>1,p2(x),1t5L/Q,δ<xdηt. This asserts admissibility of the recursion parameters; no new operation on functions is implicit in the title.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A subreciprocal , 0<c<1/2, d>1, 0<ϵ<c, and the real parameters defined in the statement.

[F1]

From Subreciprocal function and ell divisibility: A function :(0,1/2)(0,) is subreciprocal when it is nonincreasing and satisfies 1<(x)1/x throughout its domain.

[F2]

For every real y, its unique integer part satisfies yy<y+1. (Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with mx<m+1).

[F3]

logbx=logxlogb,blogbx=x,logb(bu)=u(uR). (Change of base and inversion of the positive-base real exponential).

[F4]

ar+s=aras,(ab)r=arbr,(a/b)r=ar/br,(ar)s=ars. (The exponent, product, quotient, and iterated-power laws for positive real bases and real exponents).

Proof

1.1

By [F1], (c)>1, so 0<z<1 and 0<1z<1. By [F3], b=2log2(1z)>2 satisfies 22b=1z. Thus 0<x=ϵ(1z)/2<ϵ<c<1/2 and 0<η=xd/4<1. Every evaluation of is in its domain.

F1F3given
2.1

Monotonicity in [F1] gives (x)(ϵ)(c)=z2. Consequently p2=z2(x)2(x)>1, so p>1. Also 0<QL because 1<(ϵ)1/ϵ, and log2pQ/2>0.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

Put u=2L/log2p>0. Apply [F2] to u and negate: ut<u+1. Thus t1 is an integer; t1<ut and [F3] give pt1<ϵ2pt, which proves minimality among naturals. Since u4L/Q and L/Q1, we have t<4L/Q+15L/Q.

F2F3step 2.1algebra
4.1

The inequality ϵ<1/2 implies ϵb1<21b, hence x>ϵb, and 4t>ϵ2t. By [F4], xdηt=4txd(t+1)>ϵ2t+bd(t+1). Finally 4bdt[2t+bd(t+1)]=bd(3t1)2t2t(bd1)>0, so this exceeds ϵ4bdt.

F4step 1.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

Using t5L/Q gives ϵ4bdt=24bdtL220bdL2/Q=δ. Combined with the strict inequality in the preceding step, this proves δ<xdηt and all the asserted bounds.

step 3.1step 4.1algebra

Source notes

Proof/convention locator: Bucic, Nguyen, Scott and Seymour, Induced subgraph density I, 5.2, setup preceding claim (1).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources