Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Admissible parameters for the density recursion

Statement

Let ℓ be subreciprocal, 0<c<1/2, d>1. Set z=ℓ(c)−1/2 and b=2−log⁡2(1−z)>2. For 0<ϵ<c, put L=log⁡2(1/ϵ), Q=log⁡2ℓ(ϵ), x=21−bϵ, p=zℓ(x), and η=xd/4. Let t=−⌊−2L/log⁡2p⌋, and δ=2−20bdL2/Q. Then t is the least natural number with pt≥ϵ−2 and 0<η<1,p>1,p2≥ℓ(x),1≤t≤5L/Q,δ<xdηt. This asserts admissibility of the recursion parameters; no new operation on functions is implicit in the title.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A subreciprocal ℓ, 0<c<1/2, d>1, 0<ϵ<c, and the real parameters defined in the statement.

[F1]

From Subreciprocal function and ell divisibility: A function ℓ:(0,1/2)→(0,∞) is subreciprocal when it is nonincreasing and satisfies 1<ℓ(x)≤1/x throughout its domain.

[F2]

For every real y, its unique integer part satisfies ⌊y⌋≤y<⌊y⌋+1. (Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with m≤x<m+1).

[F3]

log⁡bx=log⁡xlog⁡b,blog⁡bx=x,log⁡b(bu)=u(u∈R). (Change of base and inversion of the positive-base real exponential).

[F4]

ar+s=aras,(ab)r=arbr,(a/b)r=ar/br,(ar)s=ars. (The exponent, product, quotient, and iterated-power laws for positive real bases and real exponents).

Proof

1.1F1F3given

By [F1], ℓ(c)>1, so 0<z<1 and 0<1−z<1. By [F3], b=2−log⁡2(1−z)>2 satisfies 22−b=1−z. Thus 0<x=ϵ(1−z)/2<ϵ<c<1/2 and 0<η=xd/4<1. Every evaluation of ℓ is in its domain.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Monotonicity in [F1] gives ℓ(x)≥ℓ(ϵ)≥ℓ(c)=z−2. Consequently p2=z2ℓ(x)2≥ℓ(x)>1, so p>1. Also 0<Q≤L because 1<ℓ(ϵ)≤1/ϵ, and log⁡2p≥Q/2>0.

3.1F2F3step 2.1algebra

Put u=2L/log⁡2p>0. Apply [F2] to −u and negate: u≤t<u+1. Thus t≥1 is an integer; t−1<u≤t and [F3] give pt−1<ϵ−2≤pt, which proves minimality among naturals. Since u≤4L/Q and L/Q≥1, we have t<4L/Q+1≤5L/Q.

4.1F4step 1.1step 3.1algebra

The inequality ϵ<1/2 implies ϵb−1<21−b, hence x>ϵb, and 4−t>ϵ2t. By [F4], xdηt=4−txd(t+1)>ϵ2t+bd(t+1). Finally 4bdt−[2t+bd(t+1)]=bd(3t−1)−2t≥2t(bd−1)>0, so this exceeds ϵ4bdt.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

Using t≤5L/Q gives ϵ4bdt=2−4bdtL≥2−20bdL2/Q=δ. Combined with the strict inequality in the preceding step, this proves δ<xdηt and all the asserted bounds.

Source notes

Proof/convention locator: Bucic, Nguyen, Scott and Seymour, Induced subgraph density I, 5.2, setup preceding claim (1).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources