How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A choice-free continuous section of planar coordinate forgetting
Statement
Let , write and for the maps forgetting the last coordinate, and let , , be the radial homeomorphism with inverse . Then:
- The formula defines a continuous section of , that is .
- Transporting through the coordinatewise homeomorphisms induced by yields a continuous section of .
- Fix a base configuration and put . Then and both lie in the fibre , that fibre is path-connected, and any path in it from to yields a homomorphism with , so is split surjective on fundamental groups at .
No choice principle is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: an integer , a base configuration with , and the radial homeomorphism with two-sided inverse (A finitely punctured open disk has the homotopy type of a finite wedge of circles).
with the subspace topology, and single-coordinate evaluation is a homeomorphism (Ordered configuration spaces ).
The map , , is a homeomorphism with inverse ; it preserves arguments and multiplies moduli by the strictly increasing function (A finitely punctured open disk has the homotopy type of a finite wedge of circles).
For a path in the assignment is a group isomorphism whose two-sided inverse is (Conjugating loop classes by a path is an isomorphism of fundamental groups).
Loop classes at a point form a group under first-then-second concatenation, with the constant loop as identity and reversal as inversion (Loop classes form the group under concatenation).
Proof
The plane section. Define on . The last coordinate is a positive real number and for every , so it differs from each of ; the first coordinates are pairwise distinct because by [F1]. Hence takes values in . The absolute-value and sum operations are continuous, and a tuple of continuous coordinate maps is continuous, so is continuous; forgetting the last coordinate returns the given tuple, that is .
Complements of finite sets in the disc are path-connected. Let be finite and let . If the constant path joins them, so assume and choose with and for every ; only finitely many radii are forbidden, so such an exists, and then the circle is disjoint from and contains in its interior. For each let and be the rays from and from through extended beyond ; each meets in at most one point, so only finitely many points of are excluded. Choose outside this finite excluded set. If some lay on the segment , then with , contradicting the exclusion of ; thus , and likewise . Both segments lie in because that disc is convex and all three endpoints do, so the concatenation is a path in from to .
Conjugation and the constant loop. By [F3] every path from to gives an isomorphism with inverse ; by [F4] the constant loop at a point represents the identity class, so if is the constant path at then is the identity map of , since differs from only by insertions of constant loops at the endpoints.
The disc section. Put on , where ; explicitly with . This is continuous as a composite of continuous maps, and it takes values in : the last coordinate lies in , and it differs from because is injective and is impossible — taking moduli would give . Composing with returns the given tuple, so ; thus is a continuous section of , transported from as defined.
The based splitting. Let be the fibre over ; it contains , since for , and it contains by step 2.1. The fibre is homeomorphic to and hence path-connected by step 1.2 applied to the finite set . Choose a path from to ; such a path exists, and choosing it is a single selection, not an instance of AC. Write for the inclusion and for the conjugation isomorphism of [F3], and define , where is induced at the basepoint and . For , the path has the constant paths and at as outer factors, because lies in the fibre over , and its middle factor is by step 2.1; by [F4] and step 1.3 this class equals in , so and is split surjective.
The section is explicit, the basepoint adjustment uses one path in one fibre, and no selection over an infinite family is made; the construction is therefore choice-free. ∎
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juan Gonzalez-Meneses, Basic results on braid groups, section 2.1, printed pp. 11-14 (the explicit cross-section of the pure braid tower) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joan S. Birman and Tara E. Brendle, Braids: A Survey, section 1.3, author manuscript pp. 5-7 (splitting of the pure braid sequence) (standard reference, not scraped)