Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The theorem of the square and the Mumford homomorphism into the Picard group

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let A be an abelian variety over a field k (Abelian varieties over a field), let L be an invertible sheaf on A (Picard group of a scheme), and let ta:A→A denote translation by a∈A(k′′) for a field extension k′′/k. Then the theorem of the square holds: ta+b∗L⊗L  ≅  ta∗L⊗tb∗L for all a,b∈A(k′′), functorially in k′′. Consequently the Mumford map φL:A(k′′)⟶Pic⁡(Ak′′),a⟼[ta∗L⊗L−1], is a group homomorphism and lands in the degree-zero part of the rigidified Picard functor (The rigidified relative Picard functor and the dual abelian variety); it is compatible with field extension.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an abelian variety A over k, an invertible sheaf L on A, a field extension k′′/k and points a,b∈A(k′′).

[F1]

For an invertible sheaf L on A, the cube theorem gives m123∗L⊗m1∗L⊗m2∗L⊗m3∗L≅m12∗L⊗m13∗L⊗m23∗L on A3, where mI sums the indexed coordinates (The theorem of the cube for an abelian variety). The supplier assumes AC and DC; AC implies DC, since a choice function on the nonempty successor sets of a serial relation defines a sequence by recursion.

[F2]

The Picard group Pic⁡ consists of isomorphism classes of invertible sheaves with tensor product, and the rigidified relative Picard functor and its degree-zero part are as defined in The rigidified relative Picard functor and the dual abelian variety, Picard group of a scheme.

Proof

technique · direct: specialise the cube theorem to the standard three maps and read off the homomorphism property
1.1F1givenalgebra

Pull the identity of [F1] back along Ak′′→(Ak′′)3, x↦(x,a,b). Its factors involving x are ta+b∗L, L, ta∗L and tb∗L. The remaining factors are the constant line bundles with fibres La, Lb and La+b, each a one-dimensional k′′-vector space and therefore isomorphic to the trivial line bundle. Removing these constant factors gives ta+b∗L⊗L≅ta∗L⊗tb∗L. Although trivializations of the constant factors need not be canonical, the resulting equality of Picard classes is canonical and is preserved by field extension.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

The square identity shows that φL(a+b)=[ta+b∗L⊗L−1]=[ta∗L⊗L−1][tb∗L⊗L−1]=φL(a)φL(b) in Pic⁡(Ak′′): expand the first factor using the square identity and cancel L⊗L−1. Hence φL is a group homomorphism, and it is natural in k′′ because the constructions and L are defined over k.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra∎

For degree zero: φL(a) is represented by the difference of the two line bundles ta∗L and L, which occur as fibres of the connected family L over A under the translation family; hence its geometric-fibre restrictions are algebraically equivalent to zero, and φL lands in the algebraically trivial subfunctor of [F2], i.e. in the degree-zero part of the rigidified Picard functor.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources