Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact-operator Tikhonov bias vanishes on the minimum-norm solution

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let A:X→Y be compact between real or complex Hilbert spaces, let x†⊥ker⁡A, and put y=Ax†. For λ>0, let xλ=(A∗A+λIX)−1A∗y. Then x†−xλ=∑t∈Σλt+λPtx†, where Σ and Pt are the nonzero eigenvalues and eigenspace projections of A∗A, and lim⁡λ↓0∥x†−xλ∥=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, compact A:X→Y between Hilbert spaces, x†⊥ker⁡A, y=Ax†, and λ>0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is the hypothesis of the compact self-adjoint spectral theorem used below.

[F1]

A compact Hilbert-space Gram operator is positive and has the forward kernel: S=A∗A is compact, positive and self-adjoint, with ker⁡S=ker⁡A.

[F2]

Spectral theorem for compact self adjoint operators: For compact self-adjoint S, the nonzero eigenspaces are orthogonal and their closed span is (ker⁡S)⊥; finite-subset spectral sums converge in norm.

[F3]

Compact spectral filters, source conditions, and qualification: xλ=(A∗A+λI)−1A∗y uses the multiplier gλ(t)=(t+λ)−1.

[F4]

The shifted Hilbert-space normal operator is invertible with inverse norm at most 1/λ: For bounded A and λ>0, A∗A+λI is invertible.

[F5]

Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement: A vector in (ker⁡S)⊥ is orthogonal to every vector in ker⁡S.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F5

By [F1], ker⁡S=ker⁡A. Thus x†⊥ker⁡S, and the spectral decomposition in [F2] gives x†=∑t∈ΣPtx† as a norm-convergent finite-subset net.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Since y=Ax†, A∗y=Sx†. The filter in [F3] therefore gives xλ=gλ(S)Sx†, whose coefficient on Et is t/(t+λ). The coefficient on ker⁡S is zero. Subtracting from the expansion in step 1.1 proves the displayed bias identity.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra∎

Given ε>0, choose a finite F⊆Σ so the norm of the tail ∑t∉FPtx† is less than ε/2; this is possible because the finite-subset net in [F2] converges. Each scalar λ/(t+λ) for t∈F tends to zero, so for all sufficiently small λ>0 the norm of the finite part of the bias sum is less than ε/2. The tail has norm at most its unfiltered norm because 0≤λ/(t+λ)≤1. The triangle inequality then gives ∥x†−xλ∥<ε.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources