How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compact-operator Tikhonov bias vanishes on the minimum-norm solution
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be compact between real or complex Hilbert spaces, let , and put . For , let . Then where and are the nonzero eigenvalues and eigenspace projections of , and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, compact between Hilbert spaces, , , and .
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice is the hypothesis of the compact self-adjoint spectral theorem used below.
A compact Hilbert-space Gram operator is positive and has the forward kernel: is compact, positive and self-adjoint, with .
Spectral theorem for compact self adjoint operators: For compact self-adjoint , the nonzero eigenspaces are orthogonal and their closed span is ; finite-subset spectral sums converge in norm.
Compact spectral filters, source conditions, and qualification: uses the multiplier .
The shifted Hilbert-space normal operator is invertible with inverse norm at most : For bounded and , is invertible.
Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement: A vector in is orthogonal to every vector in .
Proof
By [F1], . Thus , and the spectral decomposition in [F2] gives as a norm-convergent finite-subset net.
Since , . The filter in [F3] therefore gives , whose coefficient on is . The coefficient on is zero. Subtracting from the expansion in step 1.1 proves the displayed bias identity.
Given , choose a finite so the norm of the tail is less than ; this is possible because the finite-subset net in [F2] converges. Each scalar for tends to zero, so for all sufficiently small the norm of the finite part of the bias sum is less than . The tail has norm at most its unfiltered norm because . The triangle inequality then gives .
Depends on
- Compact spectral filters, source conditions, and qualification
- A compact Hilbert-space Gram operator is positive and has the forward kernel
- The shifted Hilbert-space normal operator is invertible with inverse norm at most $1/\lambda$
- Spectral theorem for compact self adjoint operators
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Guido Clason, Regularization of Inverse Problems, full lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Per Christian Hansen, Introduction to Inverse Problems, Chapter 4: Regularization Methods (standard reference, not scraped)