Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A compact Hilbert-space Gram operator is positive and has the forward kernel

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let X,Y be real or complex Hilbert spaces and let A:X→Y be compact and bounded, with adjoint A∗:Y→X. Then both A∗A:X→X and AA∗:Y→Y are compact, self-adjoint and positive, and ker⁡(A∗A)=ker⁡A,ker⁡(AA∗)=ker⁡A∗.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, real or complex Hilbert spaces X,Y, a compact bounded linear operator A:X→Y, and its Hilbert adjoint A∗.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is sufficient for the Hilbert adjoint used here; the proof does not assume full Choice.

[F1]

The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator: The adjoint satisfies ⟨Ax,y⟩Y=⟨x,A∗y⟩X.

[F2]

Compact linear operator: A compact operator maps bounded sets to sets with compact closure.

[F3]

Compositions with a compact operator are compact: A composition of a compact operator with a bounded operator is compact.

[F4]

Hilbert-adjoint identities: The adjoint of a composition reverses order, and (A∗)∗=A.

[F5]

Self-adjoint, positive, unitary and normal operators: Self-adjoint means T∗=T; positive means ⟨Tx,x⟩≥0 for every x.

[F7]

The induced length is a norm: ∥x∥2=⟨x,x⟩.

Proof

1.1A1F2F3F4

Since A is compact and A∗ is bounded, [F3] makes A∗A compact. The same lemma makes AA∗ compact because it is the composition of the compact map A after the bounded map A∗. By [F4], (A∗A)∗=A∗A and (AA∗)∗=AA∗, so both are self-adjoint.

1.2F1F5F7algebra

For every x∈X, [F1] and [F7] give ⟨A∗Ax,x⟩X=⟨Ax,Ax⟩Y=∥Ax∥2≥0. For every y∈Y, the same identity gives ⟨AA∗y,y⟩Y=⟨A∗y,A∗y⟩X=∥A∗y∥2≥0. Thus both operators are positive.

2.1F1F6step 1.2algebra∎

If Ax=0, then A∗Ax=0. Conversely, if A∗Ax=0, step 1.2 implies ∥Ax∥2=⟨A∗Ax,x⟩=0, so positive definiteness [F6] gives Ax=0. Hence ker⁡(A∗A)=ker⁡A. The same argument with A∗ in place of A proves ker⁡(AA∗)=ker⁡A∗.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources