How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The translation estimate for functions on
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let , , and . For let , read on almost-everywhere classes. Then with , and where and is the Euclidean norm of . The estimate is a statement about classes and does not depend on the chosen representatives.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice, , , a scalar field , a class and a vector .
Smooth density in . Under Countable Choice, for every there are with ; Countable Choice is supplied by the assumed Axiom of Choice. (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n), The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Fundamental theorem of calculus. For a smooth function , , with the complex-valued identity read componentwise. (Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions)
Minkowski and translation isometry. Minkowski's integral inequality applies to the -integral on , and Lebesgue translation invariance gives for every . (Minkowski's integral inequality, Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation, The space as the quotient by null functions)
Vector gradient norm. The norm of the Euclidean magnitude is equivalent, with constants depending only on , to the finite sum of the component norms used in Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms. Indeed , so Minkowski bounds above by . Also , which proves convergence in when in . (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)
Weak derivatives. A locally integrable function has weak -derivative when for every ; if , this places in in that coordinate. (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)
Proof
By [F1] and Countable Choice, choose with . For a smooth the fundamental theorem [F2] gives By Cauchy--Schwarz and [F3],
For each coordinate and , the change of variables and the weak-derivative identity for give By [F3], , so [F5] proves and . Translation acts on almost-everywhere classes because it preserves null sets; hence both the derivative identity and the estimate are representative-independent.
The convergence in gives and, by [F4], . Translation is an isometry by [F3], so Letting in the inequality of step 1.1 proves .
If the estimate is equality. For every the preceding argument proves the stated estimate and translated derivative identity, with all expressions depending only on the classes in .
Depends on
- Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Weak derivative of a locally integrable function
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Translation of a function on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation
- Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions
- Minkowski's integral inequality
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (Aalto University, 2026, complete graduate lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (archived 2025 author manuscript) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (UC Davis, revised 18 June 2014, complete 242-page two-quarter notes) (standard reference, not scraped)