Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The translation estimate for W1,p functions on Rn

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let n≥1, 1≤p<∞, K∈{R,C} and u∈W1,p(Rn;K). For h∈Rn let τhu:=u(⋅−h), read on almost-everywhere classes. Then τhu∈W1,p(Rn) with Dj(τhu)=τhDju, and ∥τhu−u∥Lp(Rn)≤∣h∣ ∥Du∥Lp(Rn), where ∣Du∣=(∑j=1n∣Dju∣2)1/2 and ∣h∣ is the Euclidean norm of h. The estimate is a statement about classes and does not depend on the chosen representatives.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice, n≥1, 1≤p<∞, a scalar field K∈{R,C}, a class u∈W1,p(Rn;K) and a vector h∈Rn.

[F1]

Smooth density in W1,p(Rn). Under Countable Choice, for every u∈W1,p(Rn;K) there are φm∈Cc∞(Rn;K) with ∥φm−u∥W1,p→0; Countable Choice is supplied by the assumed Axiom of Choice. (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n), The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F2]

Fundamental theorem of calculus. For a smooth function φ, φ(x−h)−φ(x)=−∫01Dφ(x−th)⋅h dt, with the complex-valued identity read componentwise. (Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions)

[F3]

Minkowski and translation isometry. Minkowski's integral inequality applies to the t-integral on [0,1], and Lebesgue translation invariance gives ∥w(⋅−th)∥p=∥w∥p for every w∈Lp. (Minkowski's integral inequality, Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions)

[F4]

Vector gradient norm. The Lp norm of the Euclidean magnitude ∣Du∣=(∑i∣Diu∣2)1/2 is equivalent, with constants depending only on n,p, to the finite sum of the component Lp norms used in Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms. Indeed ∣Diu∣≤∣Du∣≤∑i∣Diu∣, so Minkowski bounds ∥∣Du∣∥p above by ∑i∥Diu∥p. Also ∣∣Dum∣−∣Du∣∣≤∣D(um−u)∣≤∑i∣Di(um−u)∣, which proves convergence in Lp when um→u in W1,p. (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)

[F5]

Weak derivatives. A locally integrable function v has weak ∂j-derivative w when ∫v ∂jψ=−∫wψ for every ψ∈Cc∞(Rn); if v,w∈Lp, this places v in W1,p in that coordinate. (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)

Proof

technique · Prove the estimate for smooth approximants along line segments, then use density to pass to the $W^{1,p}$ limit. Identify the translated weak derivatives by testing against compactly supported smooth functions
1.1F1F2F3given

By [F1] and Countable Choice, choose φm∈Cc∞(Rn;K) with ∥φm−u∥W1,p→0. For a smooth φ the fundamental theorem [F2] gives φ(x−h)−φ(x)=−∫01Dφ(x−th)⋅h dt. By Cauchy--Schwarz and [F3], ∥τhφ−φ∥p≤∣h∣∫01∥∣Dφ∣(⋅−th)∥p dt=∣h∣∥Dφ∥p.

1.2F3F5given

For each coordinate j and ψ∈Cc∞(Rn), the change of variables y=x−h and the weak-derivative identity for u give ∫Rn(τhu)(x) ∂jψ(x) dx=∫Rnu(y) ∂jψ(y+h) dy=−∫RnDju(y) ψ(y+h) dy=−∫Rn(τhDju)(x) ψ(x) dx. By [F3], τhDju∈Lp, so [F5] proves τhu∈W1,p and Dj(τhu)=τhDju. Translation acts on almost-everywhere classes because it preserves null sets; hence both the derivative identity and the estimate are representative-independent.

2.1F3F4step 1.1

The convergence φm→u in W1,p gives ∥φm−u∥p→0 and, by [F4], ∥∣Dφm∣−∣Du∣∥p→0. Translation is an Lp isometry by [F3], so ∣∥τhu−u∥p−∥τhφm−φm∥p∣≤2∥u−φm∥p. Letting m→∞ in the inequality of step 1.1 proves ∥τhu−u∥p≤∣h∣∥Du∥p.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2∎

If h=0 the estimate is equality. For every h the preceding argument proves the stated estimate and translated derivative identity, with all expressions depending only on the classes in Lp.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources