Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relative compactness forces uniform translation continuity in Lp

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let 1≤p<∞ and let F⊆Lp(Rn) be relatively compact, that is, its closure in Lp(Rn) is compact. In the displayed nonnegative supremum, take the value 0 if F=∅. Then sup⁡f∈F∥τhf−f∥Lp(Rn)⟶0(∣h∣→0). This is the necessity of the translation hypothesis in the Fr'echet--Kolmogorov criterion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Countable Choice, 1≤p<∞, and a relatively compact family F⊆Lp(Rn) with closure F‾.

[F1]

Compact metric spaces are totally bounded. A compact metric space is totally bounded and complete. (A compact metric space is complete and totally bounded, and neither implication uses any choice principle)

[F2]

Total boundedness is finite-net covering. A metric space (X,d) is totally bounded when for every δ>0 there are finitely many points x1,…,xN∈X with X=⋃i=1NB(xi,δ); a subset of a totally bounded space which is itself totally bounded as a subspace has the same property for every δ>0. (Finite ε-net and totally bounded metric space, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, A totally bounded metric space is bounded, every subspace of a totally bounded space is totally bounded, and the closure of a totally bounded subset is totally bounded)

[F3]

Continuity of translation in Lp. For every g∈Lp(Rn), ∥τhg−g∥p→0 as ∣h∣→0, where τhg=g(⋅−h) acts on almost-everywhere classes. (∥τhf−f∥p→0 in Lp(Rn) as h→0, for 1≤p<∞, Translation of a function on Rn)

[F4]

Translation is an Lp-isometry. ∥τhg∥p=∥g∥p for every g∈Lp(Rn) and every h, because Lebesgue measure is translation invariant. (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions)

Proof

technique · Cover the compact closure by finitely many small balls, use continuity of translation at the finitely many centres, and propagate to the whole family by the isometry property and the triangle inequality
1.1F1F2given

If F=∅ the supremum is 0 and the claim holds. Otherwise the closure F‾ is a compact subset of Lp(Rn), so (F‾,dp) is a compact metric space and [F1] makes it totally bounded. Given ε>0, [F2] provides finitely many centres f1,…,fN∈F‾ with F‾⊆⋃i=1NB(fi,ε/3).

2.1F3F4step 1.1

For each i the centre fi is an element of Lp(Rn), so [F3] gives δi>0 with ∥τhfi−fi∥p<ε/3 whenever ∣h∣<δi; set δ:=min⁡iδi>0, a minimum over the nonempty finite set of indices. By [F4], ∥τh(f−fi)∥p=∥f−fi∥p for every f∈Lp(Rn) and every h.

3.1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1∎

Fix f∈F and ∣h∣<δ. By step 1.1 there is i with ∥f−fi∥p<ε/3, and the triangle inequality together with steps 2.1 and 1.1 gives ∥τhf−f∥p≤∥τh(f−fi)∥p+∥τhfi−fi∥p+∥fi−f∥p<ε/3+ε/3+ε/3=ε. Hence sup⁡f∈F∥τhf−f∥p≤ε for all ∣h∣<δ, and since ε>0 was arbitrary the supremum tends to 0. Countable Choice enters only through the continuity-of-translation interface [F3].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources