How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative compactness forces uniform translation continuity in
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let and let be relatively compact, that is, its closure in is compact. In the displayed nonnegative supremum, take the value if . Then This is the necessity of the translation hypothesis in the Fr'echet--Kolmogorov criterion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Countable Choice, , and a relatively compact family with closure .
Compact metric spaces are totally bounded. A compact metric space is totally bounded and complete. (A compact metric space is complete and totally bounded, and neither implication uses any choice principle)
Total boundedness is finite-net covering. A metric space is totally bounded when for every there are finitely many points with ; a subset of a totally bounded space which is itself totally bounded as a subspace has the same property for every . (Finite -net and totally bounded metric space, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, A totally bounded metric space is bounded, every subspace of a totally bounded space is totally bounded, and the closure of a totally bounded subset is totally bounded)
Continuity of translation in . For every , as , where acts on almost-everywhere classes. ( in as , for , Translation of a function on )
Translation is an -isometry. for every and every , because Lebesgue measure is translation invariant. (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation, The space as the quotient by null functions)
Proof
If the supremum is and the claim holds. Otherwise the closure is a compact subset of , so is a compact metric space and [F1] makes it totally bounded. Given , [F2] provides finitely many centres with .
For each the centre is an element of , so [F3] gives with whenever ; set , a minimum over the nonempty finite set of indices. By [F4], for every and every .
Fix and . By step 1.1 there is with , and the triangle inequality together with steps 2.1 and 1.1 gives . Hence for all , and since was arbitrary the supremum tends to . Countable Choice enters only through the continuity-of-translation interface [F3].
Depends on
- $\|\tau_h f - f\|_p \to 0$ in $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$ as $h \to 0$, for $1 \le p < \infty$
- A compact metric space is complete and totally bounded, and neither implication uses any choice principle
- A totally bounded metric space is bounded, every subspace of a totally bounded space is totally bounded, and the closure of a totally bounded subset is totally bounded
- Finite $\varepsilon$-net and totally bounded metric space
- Translation of a function on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation
Used by
- High frequencies destroy uniform translation control Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (UC Davis, revised 18 June 2014, complete 242-page two-quarter notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (archived 2025 author manuscript) (standard reference, not scraped)