How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Triangular Borel maps scale Euclidean volume
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let , let be real numbers, and for let be a Borel function, where is a one-point space so that is a constant. Define the triangular map
Then is a bijection, and are Borel maps, is a Borel set for every Borel , and
Equivalently, the inverse triangular map scales volume by , and both identities hold with allowed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, an integer , positive reals , Borel functions as in the statement, and a Borel set . Put and for , and let be the diagonal scaling.
The Axiom of Choice implies the Axiom of Countable Choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice), so the countable-choice hypotheses of [F2] and [F4] are discharged for the whole argument; no further choice is used.
Tonelli's theorem: for sigma-finite measure spaces and a product-measurable , the integral over the product equals either iterated integral (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).
Under the identification , the product measure agrees with Lebesgue measure on every Borel set (On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}).
Lebesgue measure is translation invariant: for every Lebesgue measurable , and is measurable if and only if is (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation).
For nonzero real , for every Lebesgue measurable , and is measurable if and only if is (For a nonzero real , dilation by multiplies Lebesgue outer measure by , and reflection in the origin preserves it).
Proof
The factors satisfy for the shear given by : indeed .
For points written as , the shear is , a bijection whose inverse is Borel because is Borel; hence is Borel for every Borel , and for a Borel set the -section at fixed is the translate of the section of by .
The sections of a Borel set are Borel sets, because they are the preimages of under the continuous maps ; in particular they are Lebesgue measurable and [F3] applies to them.
The diagonal scaling factors as with multiplying only the -th coordinate by , and each is an invertible linear bijection whose inverse is Borel, so is Borel for every Borel .
For each and every Borel one has : writing and using [F2] and [F1], the volume is the iterated integral , whose -integrand at fixed equals , and its integral over equals the -length of the section of at by [F3] and step 1.3; integrating the unchanged section lengths over with [F1] returns .
For each and every Borel , with the -integrand at fixed equals , whose integral over is the length of the section of scaled by by [F4] in dimension one; the countable-choice hypothesis is supplied by [A1].
The shear : applying in that order changes the -th coordinate by while the higher coordinates are still the original ones, and is a Borel bijection with Borel inverse.
Integrating the section identity of step 2.2 over the remaining coordinates with [F1] and [F2] gives for every Borel .
For every Borel one has and Borel, by applying step 2.1 to the factors of the composition in step 2.3.
Consequently satisfies , and is Borel, by steps 1.4, 3.1, 3.2 and the factorization of step 1.1.
The backward recursion , run from down to , exhibits as a composition of Borel functions, so is a bijection with Borel inverse; applying the identity of step 4.1 to , which is again a triangular map with coefficients and Borel data from the same recursion, gives for Borel , and and being Borel in both directions makes each a Borel isomorphism.
Depends on
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}
- Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation
- For a nonzero real $c$, dilation by $c$ multiplies Lebesgue outer measure by $|c|^n$, and reflection in the origin preserves it
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ben Green, Additive Combinatorics, Lecture 3 §3.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian Conrad and Aaron Landesman, Math 154 Algebraic Number Theory (standard reference, not scraped)