How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Two distinct minimal normal subgroups of a primitive group are regular
Statement
Let be finite, faithful, and primitive, and let be distinct minimal normal subgroups. Then both and act regularly on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite faithful primitive action of on and distinct minimal normal subgroups .
Distinct minimal normal subgroups centralize one another (Distinct minimal normal subgroups centralize one another).
Every minimal normal subgroup of a finite faithful primitive group is transitive (Minimal normal subgroups of faithful primitive groups are transitive).
Proof
By [L2], both and are transitive on . By [L1], every element of commutes with every element of .
Fix , and let . For any , choose with ; then . Hence every element of fixes every point of , so faithfulness gives .
The subgroup is transitive with trivial point stabilizer, so it is regular. By symmetry the same argument applies to .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Leonard H. Soicher, Primitive permutation groups (standard reference, not scraped)