Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two dyadic cubes are either disjoint or one contains the other

Statement

Let n1 and let Q and Q be dyadic cubes in Rn (Dyadic cubes of generation k in Rn) of generations k and k with kk. If QQ then QQ. Consequently any two dyadic cubes are either disjoint or one of them contains the other, and two dyadic cubes of the same generation are either equal or disjoint.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural number n1 and dyadic cubes Q=Qk,m and Q=Qk,m with kk.

[L1]

Qk,m={xRn:mi2k<xi(mi+1)2k for every i<n}, and every dyadic cube is nonempty (Dyadic cubes of generation k in Rn).

[L2]

B(a,b):={xRn:ai<xibi  for every i<n} (Half-open boxes in Rn and their volume).

[F1]

For a0 and m,nZ, am+n=aman (Laws of integer exponents, claim 3; Integer powers am).

[F2]

The order relation on Z is a total order compatible with addition: xy implies x+zy+z (The integers form a totally ordered ring).

[F3]

The canonical embedding of N into Z is injective and preserves addition, multiplication and order, and its image is exactly the set of nonnegative integers, so every x0 in Z is the image of a unique natural number (The naturals embed in the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).

[F4]

For all m,nN: m<n if and only if σ(m)n (Discreteness: σ(n) is the immediate successor).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put d:=kk0 and Mi:=mi2d, an integer; then mi2k=Mi2k and (mi+1)2k=(Mi+2d)2k, so in coordinate i the cube Q is cut out by Mi2k<xi(Mi+2d)2k and the cube Q by mi2k<xi(mi+1)2k.

L1L2F1
1.2

For integers u<v one has u+1v, since vu>0 is the image of a unique natural number, that natural is not 0, hence it is at least 1 and vu1; consequently, for integers A<B and C, if the real conditions A<tB and C<tC+1 hold for some real t, then AC and C+1B, because C<A would give C+1A and tC+1A, contradicting A<t, while B<C+1 would give BC and tBC, contradicting C<t.

F2F3F4
2.1

If xQQ then step 1.2, applied in each coordinate with A:=Mi, B:=Mi+2d, C:=mi and t:=2kxi, gives Mimi and mi+1Mi+2d, so the parameter interval of Q in coordinate i is contained in that of Q, and hence QQ.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L2
3.1

For arbitrary dyadic cubes, relabel so that the generation of the first is the smaller, and step 2.1 gives the dichotomy; when the generations are equal, QQ and the symmetric conclusion QQ both hold, so Q=Q.

step 2.1L1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources