Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two dyadic cubes are either disjoint or one contains the other

Statement

Let n≥1 and let Q and Q′ be dyadic cubes in Rn (Dyadic cubes of generation k in Rn) of generations k and k′ with k≤k′. If Q∩Q′≠∅ then Q′⊆Q. Consequently any two dyadic cubes are either disjoint or one of them contains the other, and two dyadic cubes of the same generation are either equal or disjoint.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural number n≥1 and dyadic cubes Q=Qk,m and Q′=Qk′,m′ with k≤k′.

[L1]

Qk,m={ x∈Rn:mi2−k<xi≤(mi+1)2−k for every i<n }, and every dyadic cube is nonempty (Dyadic cubes of generation k in Rn).

[L2]

B(a,b):={ x∈Rn:ai<xi≤bi  for every i<n } (Half-open boxes in Rn and their volume).

[F1]

For a≠0 and m,n∈Z, am+n=aman (Laws of integer exponents, claim 3; Integer powers am).

[F2]

The order relation on Z is a total order compatible with addition: x≤y implies x+z≤y+z (The integers form a totally ordered ring).

[F3]

The canonical embedding of N into Z is injective and preserves addition, multiplication and order, and its image is exactly the set of nonnegative integers, so every x≥0 in Z is the image of a unique natural number (The naturals embed in the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).

[F4]

For all m,n∈N: m<n if and only if σ(m)≤n (Discreteness: σ(n) is the immediate successor).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2F1

Put d:=k′−k≥0 and Mi:=mi2d, an integer; then mi2−k=Mi2−k′ and (mi+1)2−k=(Mi+2d)2−k′, so in coordinate i the cube Q is cut out by Mi2−k′<xi≤(Mi+2d)2−k′ and the cube Q′ by mi′2−k′<xi≤(mi′+1)2−k′.

1.2F2F3F4

For integers u<v one has u+1≤v, since v−u>0 is the image of a unique natural number, that natural is not 0, hence it is at least 1 and v−u≥1; consequently, for integers A<B and C, if the real conditions A<t≤B and C<t≤C+1 hold for some real t, then A≤C and C+1≤B, because C<A would give C+1≤A and t≤C+1≤A, contradicting A<t, while B<C+1 would give B≤C and t≤B≤C, contradicting C<t.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L1L2

If x∈Q∩Q′ then step 1.2, applied in each coordinate with A:=Mi, B:=Mi+2d, C:=mi′ and t:=2k′xi, gives Mi≤mi′ and mi′+1≤Mi+2d, so the parameter interval of Q′ in coordinate i is contained in that of Q, and hence Q′⊆Q.

3.1step 2.1L1∎

For arbitrary dyadic cubes, relabel so that the generation of the first is the smaller, and step 2.1 gives the dichotomy; when the generations are equal, Q′⊆Q and the symmetric conclusion Q⊆Q′ both hold, so Q=Q′.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources