How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniqueness of a multivariate exponential transform
Statement
Assume AC and let . Let be a finite complex Borel measure on . Suppose there is such that . If the Laplace transform is zero for every real in an open neighborhood of , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and a finite complex Borel measure with the stated exponential moment and vanishing Laplace transform.
The Axiom of Choice: the cited Fourier uniqueness theorem uses the library's stated choice assumptions; no parameter-dependent selections are made here.
A complex measure is a finite-valued countably additive set function, The total variation |nu|(E) from countable measurable partitions, and The total variation of a signed or complex measure is a positive measure: is a positive measure; the exponential-moment hypothesis makes it finite.
Integration against a signed or complex measure, and the class L^1(nu) = L^1(|nu|) and Integrals against signed or complex measures are bounded by total variation: complex integration is defined for functions and satisfies .
Dominated convergence: dominated convergence for complex-valued functions holds with respect to the positive measure .
Identity theorem for holomorphic functions: a holomorphic function on a connected open strip that vanishes on a set with an interior accumulation point vanishes throughout that strip.
Uniqueness of finite Borel measures from their Fourier transforms: for dimension at least one, a finite complex Borel measure whose Fourier transform vanishes everywhere is zero.
Proof
If , then is a singleton and the open neighborhood in the hypothesis contains its only point; , so . If , set . Fix and a coordinate . Choose a neighborhood of on which every real coordinate has absolute value at most . The moment assumption makes integrable with respect to the positive measure [F1], and all integrands below belong to by [F2]. On this neighborhood, , while for small complex the th difference quotient is bounded by . For every sequence , [F3] gives convergence of the difference quotients in to ; the bound in [F2] transfers this convergence to their integrals against . Thus is complex differentiable in coordinate at , and, since and were arbitrary, is holomorphic in each coordinate on .
Assume . The real neighborhood contains a product of real intervals around zero. Fix real values of coordinates in those intervals. As a function of , is holomorphic on the connected strip and vanishes on a real interval; [F4] makes it zero for every in that strip. Now fix such a complex and real coordinates in their intervals and apply [F4] to coordinate . Repeating this finite process for coordinates through proves for every .
For and each , the library Fourier transform is , since . The Fourier uniqueness result [F5] then gives .
Depends on
- A complex measure is a finite-valued countably additive set function
- The total variation |nu|(E) from countable measurable partitions
- The total variation of a signed or complex measure is a positive measure
- Integration against a signed or complex measure, and the class L^1(nu) = L^1(|nu|)
- Integrals against signed or complex measures are bounded by total variation
- Dominated convergence
- Identity theorem for holomorphic functions
- Uniqueness of finite Borel measures from their Fourier transforms
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- Dirichlet parameters add under coarsening Lemma
- Finite Dirichlet gamma representation and weighted Bernstein bound Lemma
- A full exponential family is complete Theorem
- Existence of a Dirichlet process by normalized gamma Poisson random measure Theorem
- Type-H histogram posterior weak Bernstein–von Mises theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ryan Martin, Lecture Notes on Advanced Statistical Theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joshua M. Tebbs, STAT 512 Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter Kempthorne, MIT 18.655 Lecture Note 6: Sufficiency (standard reference, not scraped)
- Noah Fithian, Stat 210a Reader: Sufficiency (standard reference, not scraped)
- Noah Fithian, Stat 210a Reader: Completeness, Ancillarity, and Basu’s Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)
- Charles J. Geyer, Stat 5421 Lecture Notes: Exponential Families (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jiahao Tian, Chapter 2: Sufficiency and Exponential Families (standard reference, not scraped)