How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite Dirichlet gamma representation and weighted Bernstein bound
Statement
Assume AC. Let , , and let be independent variables. Put . Then is , and is , with mean and variance . Each has mean , variance , and moment-generating function for every real . For real satisfying , put and . If , then for , If , almost surely. Sums of disjoint groups of the are independent Gamma variables with their respective summed shapes.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Full AC, the positive finite shape vector, and the weights in the Statement.
Shape-rate Gamma distribution and The shape-rate Gamma density is normalized supply the normalized density , , for .
Dirichlet distribution, including the one-category case specifies the normalized density on the simplex, and the point mass at one for .
Finite product laws and nonnegative changes of variables are supplied by For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions.
Markov's inequality for random variables: for a nonnegative random variable and , . Applied to with and , it gives .
Uniqueness of a multivariate exponential transform identifies laws having the same finite moment-generating transform near zero under AC.
Proof
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.
The product Gamma law exists by [F3]. In its density make the substitution , . Its Jacobian is : factor from the proportion columns of the derivative matrix and add its first rows to the last; the remaining last row has first entry one and all other entries zero. The resulting density factors as times the simplex density in [F2]. Integrating either normalized factor proves both distributional assertions. For , directly.
Substituting in the Euler Gamma density gives for . Its first two derivatives at zero yield mean and variance ; differentiation is justified by an exponential majorant with any fixed parameter in . Independence makes the joint transform of disjoint group sums the product , which is the transform of the corresponding product Gamma law. By [F5], these are the same laws. In particular has the asserted mean and variance, also following from step 1.1.
For , independence and step 2.1 give . Indeed the convergent logarithm series gives for . If , set ; exponential Markov then bounds the upper tail by . Apply the same calculation to and sum the bounds. If , positivity of all forces every , so .
Depends on
- Markov's inequality for random variables
- The Axiom of Choice
- Dirichlet distribution, including the one-category case
- Shape-rate Gamma distribution
- The shape-rate Gamma density is normalized
- Uniqueness of a multivariate exponential transform
- A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions
- For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Castillo, On Bayesian supremum norm contraction rates, §4.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ferguson, A Bayesian Analysis of Some Nonparametric Problems, Section 2 (standard reference, not scraped)